๐ฃ๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐ก๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ฑ ๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐น๐ต๐ฎ ๐๐ป๐ฎ ๐๐ฒ๐ต๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ผ ๐๐ฏ ๐ฃ๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐๐ธ๐ธ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐น๐ต๐ฎ ๐๐ป ๐๐ธ๐ฝ.
Hey There Folks,
๐ด๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ถ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
, ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐. ๐จ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐
๐ ๐
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐
๐๐ ?
๐ฃ๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐ก๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ฑ ๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐น๐ต๐ฎ ๐๐ป๐ฎ ๐๐ฒ๐ต๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ผ ๐๐ฏ ๐ฃ๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐๐ธ๐ธ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐น๐ต๐ฎ ๐๐ป ๐๐ธ๐ฝ.
-๐ผ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐ค๐๐๐ก ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ค ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ข โ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ก๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ค๐๐๐๐. ๐๐ ๐ โ๐๐ค ๐คโ๐๐กโ๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ฆ, ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ซ โ๐๐โ๐๐๐โ๐ก๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐-๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ โ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ " Practical Ethics". ๐ป๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ป๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ that as ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐๐,
"๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ง๐๐
๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐ข๐๐ข๐๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐๐๐จ๐ฏ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐ซ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ง ๐๐ง๐ ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฆ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ."-๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ซ
๐๐ฌ๐ช๐ข ๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฉ example ๐ฌ๐ฃ ๐ข๐ต๐ฑ๐ฏ๐ข๐ช๐ข ๐ญ๐ฌ๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฑ๐ถ
โ
โโโโโโโ
โโโโโโโ
40 million people on earth have a deficiency of calorie protein, vitamins, and minerals needed for everyday lives. Millions of people are hungry. Many people are suffering from malnutrition and infectious anger. Serving better foods can prevent this anger. The children are affected by this.
Half of the babies born inmate in the corner country die before they were five years old. Lack of food is the misery of poor people and lack of food and lack of treatment and education.
แดตแตแตแตแต หขแตแตสณแถแต
๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ซ also shows that the poor people have more than the rich people living in developed countries:
The infant death rate is eight times higher. The average life span is one-third less. Adult education rate down 60 %. He said that extreme poverty is responsible for countless people's deaths, especially children and young men. Even if you don't die due to poverty, it creates a kind of tragic life in rich countries. It can't be noticed. Extreme poverty without death and anger is inadequate food, accommodation, machinery, healthcare, and the public's living, including education, exists in a miserable state. This is a real example of extreme poverty that exists in our world constantly. But the corner doesn't become the mainstream news of the newspaper. The problem isn't that the world cannot provide adequate food and medical treatment for its people. Northern American citizens eat more than 2000 pounds of food grains on average, where people in poor countries eat an average of 400 pounds of food grains.
.jpg)
๐๐ฌ๐ฐ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฌ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ฃ ๐ญ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฏ ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฉ๐ข ๐๐ซ๐ก ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ซ ๐ฑ๐ฅ๐ข ๐ด๐ฌ๐ฏ๐ฉ๐ก
โ
โโโโโโโ
โโโโโโโ
๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ซ said that the difference between the rich and the poor is in the developing countries, we feed most of our food grains and convert them into meat, milk, and eggs, as domestic animal-95 % of the food quality is wasted in the process of transformation. This process is responsible for the people of rich countries to eat more food than poor countries. Because the people of poor countries consume small amounts of food produced from domestic animals. If we could stop feeding domestic animals, the amount of food stored would be more than needed to end worldwide hunger if distributed to needy people. Despite buying food accommodations, clothing, essential medical care, and educational equipment, wealthy people can spend money on luxury items. Rich people don't choose to quench hunger. They choose food not to satisfy their taste. They buy new clothes to protect themselves from rain, but for children's playroom, change habitat and books. They have money to buy colorful televisions and vacation abroad. So we can't conclude that the rich countries or the rich are pushing the poor to death or giving them the chance to die. Because there is a significant difference between spending money on luxury instead of spending cash on lives and intentionally shooting people to death.
๐ฐ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐,
The first example is, Those who deliberately shoot others shoot them for the purpose of killing. And the person who buys the colorful television set assumes that he will watch the bright picture of this television. The worst thing that could happen is that instead of distributing this money to the people with disadvantages, spending money on luxury items indicates self-interest preservation and indifference to miserable people's misery. These things may be unwanted but not comparable to the kind of motive.
The second one is, For living a luxurious life doesn't need to kill people. It's easier to give someone our comfortable life money as a help than to kill them.
Third one, when people are shot, those shooting can identify the injured person. May we recognize him and his family. On the other hand, when I buy myself a little colorful television, I don't know that if the same amount of money is distributed without buying this television, that money will save a person's life.
From the above examples, it is understood that killing someone and giving someone a chance to die is not the same. Because we can think of incidents where a person poisoning rotten food causes other people to die. The above differences only indicate a limit between killing naturally and the chance of death. So, it said that we are directly responsible for the death of only those we kill, but we are not directly accountable for the end of those who die for not getting our help-the idea may also be a controversial doctrine. However, the difference proves that not helping poverty will not be reprehensible to killing them. Of course, not allowing the poor can be equivalent to a person's death by buying careless driving. Therefore, It is difficult for the person in the corner to save the lives of all people. As we blame the killer, similarly, we cannot blame a man for failing to save as many lives as he can. I mean, saving lives of all possible stay away. It can't be bought against those who don't take effort to save lives.
๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
โ
โโโโโโโ
โโโโโโโ
We can't directly say that the rich are by comparing intentional murder with not saving the poor's killer's lives. Because it is difficult for one person to save other people's life. Rather than if the rich people help the poor after their needs, extreme poverty can be eradicated a little. If they don't do it, they are wrong.