You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Changing the Curation system - Might be wise, but we need to be careful!

Wow, I didn't even now that Steemit shared my article on Twitter, but checked it out, and truly, it is there. That is awesome! Thanks for letting me now!

I do understand your upvoting problem, I just see it as getting more tempting as one get more power. For those whose upvote is worth nothing, not so interesting, but it might make it more tempting for whales to vote for own content or create tons of users and just vote for their crappy content (maybe)!

I get the point with the curation trails, so you might be true, but I also know that not all curation trails work that way. Of course, making the rewards equal, would make it easier to join a curation trail, simply because it would still give you the same benefit of upvoting, and it would make it an easier way to earn passive income. However, I fear the curation part would get weaker, simply because it wouldn't be so inspiring anymore to actually look for that content worth curating.

I will have to think more about it, it is absolutely worth thinking about!

Sort:  

Hi,

it actually is mindblowing to me that whales are the ones that game the system the most. Short term thinking and a quick ROI without thinking at potential future value. You would think that they benefit from a stable high price but nope. Maybe and hopefully we can get the message to the right people. We just need to speak up. I am not gonna do nothing.

It is never gaming proof, a DPOS is not IMO. What we can do it try to make it less lucrative and push the behavior we want down their throat.

Thanks!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.05
TRX 0.29
JST 0.043
BTC 68607.01
ETH 1988.76
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.38