You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SLC-S29/W3-“Thinking and Ideas!| Seeing Problems Differently!””

in Steem4Nigeriayesterday

Your article is very interesting, sir, because this is an internal problem for all countries. It's most likely not due to a high population, but rather to "poverty and unemployment," the consequences of every wrong policy and decision. Population growth cannot be denied or limited without awareness and firm regulations. But what is the right solution to transform a population into an intelligent and qualified asset, freeing it from dependence or, "sorry," being considered a burden on the state?

The small family program and the increased age of marriage are two interesting policies, although the government will likely have difficulty implementing the decision to "limit the rights and desires" of each individual. In this case, the government's role is not merely as a bureaucratic concept-creator but as a facilitator and implementer of problem-solving through firm regulations, or...

If that doesn't work, then another solution is for the government to focus and seriously focus on improving the quality of education and job creation. Reducing or eliminating tax burdens and implementing sustainable subsidy programs for the community's economic growth.

Good luck with your contest, my brother. 🙏

Sort:  
 7 hours ago 

Dear friend,
You have very clearly and fearlessly attempted to find a solution to this problem, but as I said, in our vast and populous country, until the people themselves become more responsible and let go of their stubbornness, they will continue to face poverty, unemployment, and discrimination. We cannot blame the government for this. Our current government has been committed to eradicating unemployment and poverty for the past two decades, but some sections of society take advantage of government schemes without adhering to the rules.
Thank you very much, and best wishes.

 4 hours ago 

Let's share and discuss sir @sur-riti ,

Indonesia and India both have abundant natural resources, but our country (Indonesia) is listed as the poorest country in Southeast Asia, while India's unemployment rate is lower than my country based on IMF data for the 2025-2026 period.

I am not blaming the government, but trying to find out the causes of this poverty using global statistical data and information services. Why do I still believe that poverty is not the result of a high population? Rather, it is due to policies of the rulers that are well accepted by the people. Can some of the solutions you offer be applied not only to India's 1 billion people, but also to the rulers and the entire government bureaucracy?

I view the policy in the state of Assam positively, which will be followed by Uttar Pradesh regarding the two-child policy. However, the goal is to limit access to government jobs and alector, not to prohibit human rights. In addition, how do you think that every small family there will truly receive full support, facilities, and access to welfare from the government?

I think you have thought objectively about the pros and cons of this idea. Is it just hoping for economic balance and efficiency, but on the other hand weakening social support and limiting the opportunities for a longer life for a generation?

I have no right to challenge the interests of the country or your interesting ideas, sir, but I am very sad if my country enforces this rule because I am the third of four children. Will I be considered a burden on the country?

I apologize, sir, @sur-riti if we have different views on this matter. I hope your contest will be successful... 🙏