(Even without brains you still have something called instinct.)
Don't know why I'm attracted to that and maybe it's the whole post.Won't lie, I use AI sometimes when I'm too lazy to think much for myself (it's like: let this guy do the thinking) or when there's been assignments and you forgot till the dime minute. What is even hurting is I forget to at least go through what I wrote or even go back to check it out. It's one seed of laziness and makes you find comfort in stagnancy. What's upstairs or within is a seed which is supposed to grow to the outside world to showcase it fruits which continues until it's a field. Truly, no one is perfect but we should try to build ourselves so we go up to know what's there instead of waiting down receiving infos of what's up without taking the step to even see for ourselves.
It has already been proven that what is written on paper sticks in the memory better. And look where we’ve ended up. People no longer write on paper. They no longer read from paper; they don’t read before they start using AI it announces it can make mistakes; they are incapable of being critical, of asking questions, of looking for sources, of reading through the text, and with that, the recipe for a brainless humanity is complete. Certainly suitable for the brain chip Trump is talking about. A chip with which you never have to think again, not even are allowed to think for yourself.
The brain tumours and headaches are a mere side effect. There are plenty of people to sacrifice, and the art of euthanasia is the future (wasn’t such a person called an executioner in the past?).
I think the fact that people no longer wonder, search for answers, investigate things for themselves also says something. Not just about a lack of time, but much more about a lack of curiosity and interest. An intelligent person is curious; a highly intelligent person is even more curious. These are people who want to know and investigate everything; I notice this is becoming increasingly rare, and for many it is not even present. That has nothing to do with a lack of time, them simply not feeling like it on a particular day, being laxy, but with what I call a major shortcoming. A major shortcoming and a major loss. I notice this clearly on this platform too. Simply insisting that something is right when it isn’t, even though it can be found in any dictionary. And then still insisting, without even being motivated to check whether it’s true. I would certainly do that. And then there’s the secrecy of AI users, getting furious when they get a bad mark because AI got it wrong.
If they’re really going to create that brain-extension chip AI stuff which is like turning humans into cyborgs—they’d really have to be more careful. I remember hearing a saying somewhere, though I can't place it: 'For the sake of peace we've created a weapon of war, for the sake of ease our hardship grows, and for love of power we've made our doom.
I guess what we're seeing now is only the beginning. I just hope there are more wise people out there than those focused on building this potential 'nuclear bomb' of a technology. As long as there’s nothing wrong with our natural brains, we’ll still be able to think, but the divide between the wise and the foolish is definitely going to get a lot wider in that scenario.
Nothing is inherently bad to use—it’s the what, how, and when that determines the outcome. I’m not really in support of the brainchip-AI thing because it could make some people even more stupid(and it looks like some brains will get fried to create it if they haven't succeeded), but if someone is already wise , it could lead to a more....(Anything can happen, damn the topic is complicated yet interesting.)
🍀❤️
@wakeupkitty