RE: A proposal Introducing #all4null - Make one or more posts per week and set the rewards 100% to @null
Good information here. Thank you @the-gorilla. Eye opener too.
there's nothing wrong in deciding to take a break from Steemit and choosing to powerdown whilst you decide to do so
Definitely not. Except that people naturally expect the accounts making rules and policing to follow the rules. So why are we hunting down people in club100 who accumulate steem from SC01 votes, power down and take a break. How is that different from what you did? Where is the long-term commitment encouraged by the clubs project?
Not people like you who are offended when their quest for power is challenged
Am not offended at all. As you already know, this is a blockchain. The wallets are open. Everyone sees the transactions. So when an account that have sold off its Steem, is investigating and promoting transparency, it should be the prime example.
I am willing to step down from any position of power if found guilty. I just want to be sure that rules are made for everyone, and not for some special people.
Which rules are you referring to? The "rules" that increase the probability of a sc01 upvote?
( I believe that) The reason I was asked to look was because there is a belief that "the people" is "a person". Or maybe a few people. Like @lindybaby... a user with extremely interesting and complex usage of various wallets. But a profile that didn't go beyond an Achievement 1 post - a post that cites you as their reason for joining.
You don't need any special tools to review their wallet - https://steemitwallet.com/@lindybaby/transfers - that's not normal activity and it's been suggested that you know who the real person behind this account is... and their various other accounts.
@the-gorilla. I am done. The steemit team should make the final decision. Thank you.
I find your response surprising, particularly following my pressing of your knowledge about @lindybaby and the activity in their wallet.
Activity that you're clearly linked to having awarded prizes for this contest and this contest from the @lindybaby account, just 3 months ago - a user that you said:
As I said before:
I don't know what "final decision" you'll be waiting for @steemcurator01 to make - I've said from the start that "it's suspicious but not conclusive".
Your choice not to address your link to this particularly suspicious account / activity make it increasingly so.
Everything I said from my first response till now are verifiable information and nothing changed. As reminder here are they again.
I used @lindybaby from immediately after the clubs to sell or receive Steem. All transactions before late 2021 were done by my account. If I continued using my account @focusnow for receiving and selling Steem, my club status won't stand.
I awarded contest prizes 3 months ago - remember I mentioned I started using lindybaby late 2021, 3 months ago is within that timeframe.
For example again, there were 32 users that did save2soar, remember @save2soar a Community project was here wrongly listed as one of my accounts. When that projected ended, we distributed the savings back to the owners. Some opted to receive there's through an exchange.
Lindybaby have received and sold Steem for numerous users, too many. You can still investigate further. The impression here is that some or all the accounts that sent Steem to lindybaby are mine, which I don't know how that observation can be supported reasonably.
The above are my submissions and repeating them severally does not make sense, which was why I felt I have given enough information for this investigation. Thank you.
Thank you. Whilst you may consider yourself to be "repeating them severally", what you have written above is somewhat more substantial than your original response of: