RE: DISCUSSION: Best way to handle Community Curators program requirements (starting 1st of May)
Hello @crypto.piotr
I think the proposal is fair, it is logical to think that if STMINC will give a support it will want to benefit with it who will benefit the steem community. This seems to me coherent, and it is also better to promote than to vote against.
In this case, it is good to believe that the same users should stick to these rules from tomorrow, not to make cross-publications, because it would bring on one hand that you would not receive a vote in favor of those 200k and also you have to understand that you are not complying with that basic rule.
And I also think it is very good that the weight of the vote depends on the interaction with those who comment on our publications and also visit other publications. That's very good, it's about writing quality content, of course, and receiving an economic benefit for it, but it's very important to comment on other people's posts. A post without comments makes no sense, in my opinion. Luckily, that thing about publications without comments doesn't happen in PH...
Thank you for dropping by and sharing your thoughts with me @josevas217
Appreciate it.
Yours, Piotr