You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SLC31-W5 | THE GREEN JOURNEY | Wild Creativity.

in Story On Steem8 days ago

Thank you for your participation in https://steemit.com/challengepitch/@muzack1/steemit-challenge-season-31-application-the-green-journey.
Here is the evaluation of @sohanurrahman – “ SLC31-W3 | THE GREEN JOURNEY |Wild Creativity.”., following the official Week 3 rubric.

DescriptionInformationScore
Reporting PreparationFresh Stories, inspections, research, observation4.5/5
Location + Steematlas PinGoogle Maps and Atlas locations need to be set up correctly1/1
Photo (required)There must be 6-8 images that are clearly showing the place0.8/1
Video (required)Clear (YouTube) video and a speem.watch link of the place must be recorded1/1
Selfie (required)User must share a selfie or an identification card1/1
Happy endingObservation Ending1/1
Final ScoreAfter considering everything9.3 / 10

The photos you shared are interesting and very artistic, but they are the work of others. In fact, you shared too many photos, so you couldn’t describe them in detail. Please note that sharing too many photos without providing detailed explanations makes the post less engaging. The videos you’ve shared are very engaging; they contain elements that make what you’re showing more appealing to people who want to watch them.

Sort:  

The photos you shared are interesting and very artistic, but they are the work of others. In fact, you shared too many photos, so you couldn’t describe them in detail. Please note that sharing too many photos without providing detailed explanations makes the post less engaging.

You didn't mention in the contest that I can not share the work of others and I captioned every photos. I shared more than 6-8 photos but got less mark which is disappointing.I don't know what kind of details are you asking, are you asking to write a paragraph under every photo? It is noticeable that you are giving more mark to the participants who didn't share quality image.

I am sharing some screenshots from a post where a user gave very short captions and did not caption some images at all. However, you did not mention any issue about image caption in your review. This user also did not share the images according to the guidelines of your contest, but this issue was not mentioned in the review either.

Unique leaves 🍃
Flower colors 🌸
Tree patterns 🌳
Stone shapes 🪨
Reflection in water 💧
Natural shadows ☀️
Handmade eco decorations 🏡

Despite that, the user still received a 9.8 score, which honestly does not seem realistic or fair compared to the contest guidelines.

Please make the judging more consistent with the rules and examples provided in the contest.

Sorry for the mention, @steemcurator01. I noticed this issue previously as well, but I did not say anything at that time. However, seeing it happen repeatedly is really unfortunate. I genuinely feel that the contest reviews are not being done properly and consistently with the guidelines provided by the contest holder. Thank you.

The photo you displayed does not comply with the challenge rules, This is something you need to pay attention to.

There was no Unique leaves 🍃,Flower colors 🌸,Tree patterns 🌳,Stone shapes 🪨, Reflection in water 💧, Natural shadows ☀️or Handmade eco decorations 🏡 in the post, than how it followed the Guidelines and scored 9.8?

Video requirement (mandatory):
✅ Speem.watch link (primary upload)
✅ A second link viewable on steemit.com (recommended: YouTube

The user only shared one video link and also didn't follow this rule. I hope you should made him winner before your contest end. Thank you for sharing such a controversial, dishonest and blind review, which is ridiculous.