You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SLC S23 Week4 || Quadrilaterals
| Task | Comment | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Parallelogram | The color shading of the angles was enough, and if there is a desire to include numerical values, it would have been better to choose a dark (black) color. Also, it’s not necessary to move the vertex so quickly during the demonstration—slower would be better. | 1.6/1.8 |
| 2. Trapezoid | The trapezoids are well constructed, and the color scheme is nice. However, numerical labels are more suitable for problems, while here, graphical notations would suffice. The isosceles trapezoid is well built. For angle notation, it’s better to use the Unicode symbol ∠ instead of <. | 1.7/1.8 |
| 3. Rhombus | It's originally thought out how to construct the rhombus; I built it differently. I constructed it with a fixed center. Also, it’s unnecessary to mention "extra" properties if it's already known that a rhombus is a parallelogram. | 1.6/1.8 |
| 4. Rectangle | Regarding the rectangle, I would say the same as for the rhombus — it’s unnecessary to mention the properties of a parallelogram, since a rectangle is already a parallelogram. | 1.7/1.8 |
| 5. Square | Four sides and 4 vertices apply to any quadrilateral in general, so it’s unnecessary to describe the "extra" properties. It’s better to focus on what is unique to the square, in contrast to the parallelogram, rhombus, and rectangle. | 1.6/1.8 |
| Point for aesthetics and neatness. | The drawings are done in a single color scheme⭐, which looks nice and stands out clearly. ⭐ for the first submitted work. | 1/1 |
Total: 9.2⭐⭐ / 10
Thank you @sergeyk!