RE: Talk Channel: "Comment or ask a question"/ Comente o pregunte (week 273) in the WOX
I have no information on this; in fact, I think it's not true, there is freedom to apply to be a mentor.
Then you better read the new rules set and for sure there will be more.
If you aren't keen to write about your project in normal, understandable language, you should not count on the votes of the common man. It's as simple as that. Steemit is not a platform of highly educated and developers onor and also not of investors with a group of lawyers or financial advisors telling them that voting for a proposal is a great idea. Is there a business plan? A financial report before we all vote and get lured? Let's also keep in mind that Telegram is famous for scam games, and most of us have never heard of this person.
Still, those who don't change do receive support for the third, forth you name it time, and I like to know why if others are broken to the ground without ever using AI, committing plagiarism or hacking steemcurator accounts. I am sorry to say this, but if those rewards keep coming, it only proves that the top is totally fine with it, which gives me weird thoughts.
Investing in something else means Steemit did a bad job.
It's not due to the market, steem is passive or we are but because there's no clarity about what this platform is and we are more like a crumpled leaf in autumn following the wind, no matter in what direction. Let's hope the year of the Snake will shine more light and not all creative minds will leave and stop commenting.
A good weekend friend.
Steemitblog
This rule clears up any doubts.
It's true that those promoting a project must have the capacity to reach the entire audience, not just a specific sector. Perhaps a team is needed to improve marketing efficiency and gain more support.
I prefer to think they like giving second chances, not that they support bad behavior.
I remember two cases where people withdrew their Steem because they had to migrate to another country to reunite with their families, and others did so to improve their quality of life, something I don't criticize.
Happy weekend.
Rules changed again? Just like promoting to join as many as possible to make a change to be uovoted? Is this the way to make people enthusiastic or a way to fool the system or is it mire like gambling?
Migrating as in needing money or in that country is no internet access?
I don't care if people need the steem but I do care about the threads and the fact the average low reputated is punished and scolded while others can do as they like.
Where are those rules?
@aneukpineung78 showed them to me I assume in one of the steam blog posts
That information must be very old.
I don't think that long ago, but never saw it mentioned and he spoke about it lately. Not that club100 says a lot but neither says the "accessible" to everyone since most lessons are not.
Currently, there are no requirements related to Club100; they are no longer essential to obtain support or to participate in some dynamics. The only thing that is not required is that the user has the shutdown option enabled.