Cancelling Inertia... Up to a Point!
Inertia is a sequential lag of the single electrons making up something.
But in a state of coherence, those same electrons cannot have any conflict or lag. Everything acts as one. And dependent upon the coherent potential in the form of electron pairs that are bound… Those pairs act like a shield with more total kinetic energy than any single electron's energy trying to disturb that state... up to a point.
There is a lot to understand regarding this heretical perspective and radical departure from space-time, aether theory and much of quantum theory.
I liken the mechanism to the Leidenfrost effect on steroids... but on the subatomic level. There is a phase transition of electron pairs escaping a coherent boundary and dropping energy levels. The electron pairs are spring-loaded due to being bound and confided orthogonally in 2 dimensions. Unable to corkscrew or move up and down on the Z axis. Trapped by Lorentz force and other factors. The electrons can "slither" like a snake on the ground moving side to side or front to back in sine waves.. but not up and down as well. 2D propagation in a sheet or in a ring like Saturn. Longitudinal.
I call the mechanism a Newton's Vice (as opposed to a Newton's Cradle.)
It's like a spring-loaded "Wigner crystal".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_crystal
See David LaPoint's "Primer Fields" magnet test here for a visual example:
Here are some segments to presentations I gave with experiments SIMULATING monopoles and Halbach Arrays:
- https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1894093411365654682
- https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1893390275311214768
- https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1893711232890528036
The ball bearings adopt the one North or one South Pole they are influenced by. So the ball bearings aren't magnets unto themselves but rather adopt the magnetic field around them.
Bring a ball bearing near the North pole of a magnet... that ball bearing will be all north pole. SIMULATING a monopole. But not a literal one, since the ball bearing doesn't have a quasi-permanent magnetic field unto itself with solidified domains.
The ball bearings oppose each other since they all adopt the same pole on the same side of the magnet. Yet they have long range attraction to the magnet itself, with short range repulsion between each other. SIMULATING Van der Walls forces and subatomic (quantum) behavior on a macro scale and at a constant. Electrons are all negatively charged. So the ball bearings in the experiment simulate how electrons behave when trapped in 2D from various forces.
To understand more about canceling inertia, here are some experiments I came up with to demonstrate.
Lenz Law "Eddy Current" Experiments 1 of 3 - Magnets Falling Down a solid copper pipe... PVC pipe... and PVC pipe wrapped with copper wire.
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1885754207975948563?s=20
In that first experiment, I demonstrate that the magnet falling down the copper tube does not experience inertia at all, even if you violently shake the tube up and down as the magnet falls!
At 2 minutes and 15 seconds in that first video, the magnet falls down the copper tube no matter how much you shake the tube and try to disturb the rate it falls. Eddy Currents formed is described by Lenz Law. And those forces protect the magnet from the inertia in this scenario.
Here is another basic demonstration canceling inertia.
At around 1 minute 15 seconds, the platform is shaken at a 45 degree angle and those magnets are prevented from touching that spinning copper due to the eddy current "force field". It's as if the magnets and the copper are acting as one. The magnets following in the wake of the eddy currents with no lag between states.
Lenz Law "Eddy Current" Experiments 2 of 3 - Magnet Rings and a Spinning Copper Rod.
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1886142053090042177?s=20
What is super interesting to me is that once again... you can violently shake the entire platform and it WILL NOT disturb the magnets. The magnet rings will not touch that copper after a certain RPM.
You could make violent 90˚ turns and from the perspective of the magnets... it's just moving in slow motion relative to the copper. Just like how the magnet falls in slow motion relative to the copper down the tube in Experiment 1 of 3.
But this is just at a higher velocity relative to a stationary observer viewing the rotating system. But it doesn't matter if it's a centripetally rotating system at a constant velocity or linear acceleration in a particular direction... those eddy currents act as a force field to protect whatever is relative to the magnets and/or copper in those moments.
Just as the electrons making up and object with protect that object if those electrons are in a coherent and spring-loaded state.
Under a certain RPM... there is nothing that can make those magnets touch the copper. But after a certain RPM or intensity of violent lateral shaking... the gauss and eddy currents will be overcome by the momentum of the mass of the materials themselves... and the force of inertia will begin to emerge again.
Thus you can cancel inertia... up to a point. Dependent upon the amount of coherent potential or amount of forces at play for a given scenario.
YouTube deleted these discussions and videos because they labeled each one of them individually as "medical misinformation."
Depending upon the amount of spring loaded force of those electron pairs… you can make a 90° turn at 1000 miles an hour, 10,000 miles an hour or 100,000 miles an hour, etc.
If you only have so much spring loaded force built up… You'll be able to make that 90° turn at 1000 miles an hour without any inertia. But if you don't have enough coherent potential, built up in the form of spring-loaded electron pairs… and you try to take that same 90° turn at 10,000 miles an hour, you might feel 30% the inertia that you normally would.
So, depending upon the amount of coherent potential you have built up can determine how much inertia that you can cancel out with a given action.
Imagine stacking magnets, so that they want to repel from each other. Each magnet you add to the stack, creates more tension and spring-loaded force in the magnetic field. Like a Gauss gun… When you let go of the top magnet in that stack… It will accelerate and spring load away from the rest of the stack with an equal amount of force as the total amount of magnets present.
Now apply that to the subatomic scale in 2 dimensions with negatively charged electrons that want to repel from each other. They are forced together in a state of coherence. So much so that there can be no vibration or difference between the constituents in the spring loaded state. Add one electron or take an electron away… the entire spring loaded state feels it immediately. Like displacement sitting in a bathtub and the medium reacts on demand/simultaneously.
So any one single electron outside of that state, cannot possibly have the oomph or energy to overtake the total amount of spring loaded potential present. But the faster that you go… And then try to break that linear path… You will be punished through a sequential lag of inertia. But if you have enough potential built up… You can cancel it out... up to a point.
There are always limits and maximums. But at lower velocities and intensities... inertia can absolutely be negated and canceled out. To result in faster than light travel without any nonsensical "warp drive".
Why Warp Drive is Not Real but FTL Travel Is Genuine:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/2030668444446933431?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Dr. Paul Brown's Resonant Nuclear Battery:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/2014975137117044876?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Resonant Nuclear Battery Intro:
Why Aneutronic Fusion is Laughable Compared to the Resonant Nuclear Battery:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/2028489769857298805?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Book 2 of 4 - GRAVITY:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/2012797778716733588?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Gravity is Not Electric. Gravity is Not Space-Time Curvature:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/2014074776223097070?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Addressing Gravity:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/2032198955812208821?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
No space-time
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1974985998749819334?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
No Aether 1:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1863275517862125670?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Is Aether Real? Relativity vs Reality Part 3/71
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1767274194407219663?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Discussing current flow, Lorentz force, magnetic orientations and differences in conventional magnetization versus an exotic method of imprinting waveforms which is the mechanism to facilitate the flow of electron pairs.
John Searl's SEG Mockup: Newton's Laws & Lorentz Force Part 1
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1891192191470674365
John Searl's SEG Mockup: Newton's Laws & Lorentz Force Part 2
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1891568649649127892
Searl's Cradle: Elastic & Inelastic Collisions of Charged Particles
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1891902008426365045
This article on Cancelling Inertia is to give people perspective since many are parroting the same outdated talking points about gravity control, dampening inertia, faster than light travel/communication, free energy, etc.
But everyone is doing so under the framework of Relativity. Drop it!
As Einstein himself wrote in a letter to Erwin Finley-Freundlich in August of 1913:
"Wenn die Lichtgeschwindigkeit auch nur ein bißchen von der Geschwindigkeit der Lichtquelle abhängig ist, dann ist meine ganze Relativitätstheorie und Gravitationstheorie falsch."
"If the velocity of light is even a little bit dependent upon the velocity of the light source, then my ENTIRE theory of Relativity and theory of Gravitation is false."
It turns out, the velocity of light is indeed dependent upon the velocity of the light source. Here is exactly why.
Doppler Effect Misnomer 2:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/2016227860886032837?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Doppler Effect Misnomer 3:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/2018196525017714953?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Michaelson-Morley's Interferometer Experiments: The Fallacy of Fringe Shifts:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/2023185620676550857?s=20
Double Slit Illusion/ Fallacy:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/2022172974472974598?s=20
I find it weird and suspicious how many top podcasters and people claiming to be all about "disclosure", Free Energy, UFOs/UAPs, exotic technologies, etc... they all seem to actively dismiss and purposefully ignore the volumes of information they claim to be about. Why? Too much of a challenge against the dogmatic status quo of group-think? Don't like someone outside your nepotism of thought?
I know the cancelling of inertia is genuine because I've personally seen it in action... over my own damn house!
On October 14th 2008, 4 of my friends were visiting me at my house right when it was getting dark around 6:15pm and we all witnessed a craft descend over my house! Looked like a satellite at first but then stopped. And descended from the upper atmosphere, down to what looked to be just 1000-2000 feet above the house in a few seconds. Solid white ball of light. Silent. It hovered above the house for about 15 seconds and then ZIPPED OFF into the distance about 20 miles away line sight in about 3 seconds. Couldn't fuckin believe it. I'll never believe it. Unreal. It was one of the most amazing things I've ever seen in my life. And that's not the only time I've seen it. So, to me... it's about figuring out the mechanism while everyone else debates whether it's even possible or not while wearing a veil of relativity.
I calculated the G forces for the acceleration of moving from a standstill to 20 miles away in 3 seconds and it's like:
364.345 Gs
3573 m/s²
12862.8 km/h²
11722.4 ft/s²
7992.48 mi/h²
So… If gravity is indeed produced from the formation of electron pairs and subsequent decoupling of those pairs at a constant... and John Searl's SEG is claimed to produce electron pairs at a faster rate than they can leave (in an overloaded, super conductive state)... and that might help explain the mechanism of some so-called UFOs.
Those electron pairs can also remediate nuclear radiation. So just by hovering over a nuclear site, the radioactive isotopes in intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) could be rendered inert. Because the spring loaded force of those electron pairs on the subatomic level has enough oomph to breach the Coulomb barrier and saturate the neutrons with high velocity electrons, which will change the charge of the atom on demand. Without need for direct inelastic collisions. The energy can be transmitted through the electric and magnetic fields, analogous to a newtons cradle. Spookily... and at a distance...
Dr. Greer Contradictions:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1827806081214746999?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Want Real Free Energy/UFOs?
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1890121213839835558?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Gaia Episode on John Searl with Insider Jason Verbelli
https://www.gaia.com/video/searl-s-ufo-seized-by-corrupt-corp
Magnetic Waveform Thread
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1879732876956299512?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
What is the SEG (detailed vid)
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1881774717289513217?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Magnetic Experiments & work of John Searl:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1902041298116472985
Free Energy Is Real:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/2028161875066880260?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Mockup Demo - Magnetic Waveforms & More
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1880371977346773397?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Intro to the Law of Squares & Magnetic Waves
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1880487491578524144?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Superconducting Overload & Gravitational Anomalies
https://rumble.com/vbs2dv-superconductor-overloading-energy-analogy-seg.html
Misconception of Over Unity:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1892306886453862897
Some Reality on How to make an SEG:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1883730589439885809?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Professor John Searl Album:
https://goo.gl/photos/e3Xc1S8vAirduGhJ7
Four Paths to Investigation:
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1889388556084510784?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
Parable of the Pipeline - Working Hard vs Working Smart
https://x.com/therealverbz/status/1889391923246539261?s=46&t=JhcGFRVj667kIEx6GxtHvg
There is a lot more to this mechanism of electron pairs and coherence.
You can definitely say it is ontologically mutually exclusive. But I don't think anyone can just outright say it is "wrong" with scientific sincerity. The math of emissions and re-emissions of gravity due to electron decoupling is internally consistent and stands on its own legs.
What are the implications of this interpretation being true?
What are the implications of ignoring or dismissing the validity versus stress testing it and embracing it if it passes muster?
My aim is to stand firmly with internal consistency and logic. To show an equivalence to all relativistic procedures without need for corrections. And my goal is to have people understand my point of view before accepting or rejecting it.
I don't need to topple all of relativity and quantum theory. That would be an unreasonable goal or task on the part of any one given person. But rather, all I need to do is create reasonable doubt for the existing model, while creating a reasonable assumption for the new model of equal predictive power and accuracy. Then time will tell the rest of the tale through true science and stress testing the alternative.