You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Politics Of Consumerism: The Cult Of Celebrity
Thank you for a more then accurate post, if people want to easily see the manipulation just look at government regulations in the media.... The government decides who gets on tv.
Actually, it almost seems that the media decides who gets into politics!
Yes, the people - conspirators - behind the media:
https://ia800208.us.archive.org/15/items/TheRockefellerFile/AllenGary-1976TheRockefellerFile.pdf
With money the Rockefellers gained control of the media. With the media the family gained control over public opinion. With control over public opinion they gained control of politics. And with control of politics, they are taking control of the nation.
The elites infiltrated and took over many instutions of our society and deliberately debased it and pushed socialism, so to weaken the U.S., our morals, Constitution, etc, to drive the U.S. into a one-world socialist government that they control.
http://loveforlife.com.au/print/3059
Excellent article, cult-of-celebrity/personality and propaganda reminds me of empty shell/shill Presidential candidate Adam Kokesh and his followers - with Adam's cukoo, extremely inadequate - only fixing the Federal Reserve - and dangerous platform (dissolving the Federal government, Constitution, instead of restoring it). Very intelligent, relevant and thought-provoking article.
hmm I think your right so the media gets people in politics and to return the favor government makes sure these media companies stay on top.
That's how the game is played. Think about it... who chooses who runs in elections- we don't. If the media doesn't like a candidate, they get no exposure (unless they're Trump and can buy it)
Yep, again, I would just preface the word "media" in your post, with "conspirators, New World Order, secret societies that control the mass media/world, like the Council On Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, big, liberal, tax-exept foundations and the Skull & Bones secret society."
Additionally, if a Presidential candidate - like Barry Goldwater, 1964 - doesn't play the New World Order/Illuminati's ball game, they might get negative media attention and I think it could be quite significant since the elites control virtually all public opinion and every major institution in the world.
As Lord Acton said,
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."*
One of my favorite quotes. There was a guy who ran in 1980 as an independent- John Anderson. He made the mistake of telling the truth and was marginalized for it.
ron paul ran as an idependent in the 80s and 2008 and 2012 after trying to run as republican exempt in the 80s he ran for straight libertarian
I like Ron Paul- he's fundamentally an honest guy. I like Ralph Nader. I was on a panel with him at an academic conference and we had lunch afterward. I disagree with almost everything he says, but I respect him.
Not honest enough, with the people. And Nader was also bankrolled and advised by Rockefellers:
http://www.voxfux.com/features/rockefeller/ch9-11.html Gary Allen's The Rockefeller File
Ralph Nader, the man who once told an audience that what we need is "somekind of communism" is also bankrolled by the Rockefeller network in his attempt to destroy the free enterprise system. Among the groups financing the Caped Crusader are the ubiquitous Ford Foundation and the Field Foundation, both CFR interlocked. Nader is not really fighting the Establishment. He works for it. According to a Business Week article reprinted in the Congressional Record of March 10, 1971, John D. Rockefeller IV is even an advisor to Nader.
John Andersen was also a member of the CFR and Trilateral Commission (Establishment/elites/Rockefeller).
http://loveforlife.com.au/print/3059
The Council on Foreign Relations And the Trilateral Commission
The two organizations that run the United States
by Melvin Sickler
1980 James Carter = CFR, founding Trilateral; Reagan = United World Federalists; G.H.W. Bush = CFR, Trilateral, CIA; Anderson = CFR, Trilateral.
Anderson wasn't so independent, after all. A CFR, Trilateral telling the truth is almost historical.
The Insiders, by John F. McManus
https://ia801400.us.archive.org/2/items/pdfy-BTeH83PE7rJz6T2g/The%20Insiders%20-%20By%20John%20F.%20McManus.pdf
In New Hampshire, for instance, where the first presidential primary is held every fourth
February, most of the candidates for the Republican nomination were happily responding to
voters that they were "not now and never have been" members of Davld Rockefeller's
Trilateral Commission or his Council on Foreign Relations. But Republican candidates
George Bush and John Anderson could not join in such a response because each had
connections to both of these elitist organizations.
If you come across somebody who's perfect let me know.
We're talking about a conspiracy - to enslave and conquer the world. It's not a If you come across somebody who's perfect let me know kind of a situation. Sounds like a cop out. How is humanity going to get out of this mess with that attitude, and when people deny facts.
Larry McDonald...100% conservative, constitutional rating while in The Congress; Barry Goldwater, John Rarick, John G. Schmitz...were on to the Conspiracy and possibly true opposition.
https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/4787-larry-mcdonald-an-american-hero-remembered?tmpl=component&print=1
During his tenure in office, Congressman McDonald always scored a solid 100 percent in “The Conservative Index,” then published in The Review Of The News (the predecessor to The New American). McDonald also scored a 100 percent rating from both Americans for Conservative Action and the National Conservative Political Action Committee’s (NCPAC) “Conservative Index.”
One of my favorite quotes. There was a guy who ran in 1980 as an independent- John Anderson. He made the mistake of telling the truth and was marginalized for it.
correct but technically we still elect them I mean its just the people who decide to watch fox and cnn who are picking the people who they see instead of who they actually research.
But the Elites/New World Order always plays both or several sides, so the choice of candidates are often associated with the Establishment. They win, often no matter what. We basically have a one party system with 2 or several names - what Gary Allen called the Rockepubs and Rockedems.
In the 2016 U.S. Presidential election, InfoWars.com said all major party candidates were Establishment and the Constitution Party - likely controlled opposition - said all Republican candidates, including Rand Paul, were associated with the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR, the Establishment).
And it doesn't get any better with the Libertarian Party: I don't know much about them, but in 2016 their Vice Presidential candidate, Governor William Weld was a member of the CFR. And of course this year, with their kooky candidate and platform...I made a small post about Adam Kokesh and Cliff Kincaid of aim.org wrote about him
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/russian-tv-and-code-pink-disrupt-memorial-day-activities/
Ron Paul was legit and rand paul is his son so i dont think rand is for the establishment check his voting record, but i agree everyone else besides rand is for bigger government
https://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/ron-and-rand-paul-were-never-going-to.html
Ron and Rand Paul Were Never Going to Save Us
and Trump had a large media footprint of his own long before politics