How invested are you in that dogma? Are you willing to drown rather than admit you were wrong and the ship is sinking?
Seeing anytime anything remotely related to challenging the political narrative of climate change down voted by a single powerful actor here on steemit made me think of the above sign.
One of them was down voted simply stated.
"If 97% of the people believe a false thing is true. It is still false."
Is that not a statement of truth? True/False
Yet that was flagged. It did have a tag of #climatechange yet that was ALL the content actually said.
So will they sink with the ship rather than admit they are wrong? They might not be wrong, but they clearly are unwilling to back it up with discussion. Instead they'd cut the tongues out of the people warning them that their ship is sinking.
EDIT: Here are my three posts that were flagged to where one of them is still censored and you have to click to SHOW it twice to even see what it says. The other two were in this state too, but one had a larger voter, and the other got enough votes to barely poke above the obscurity markers.
- If 97% of the people believe a false thing is true. It is still false.
- In science if the prediction made by your model does not manifest, your model is wrong, as was your prediction.
- Your consensus be damned...
Are those statements false? If so, prove it.
Give 'em hell,...
Curated for #informationwar (by @thoughts-in-time)
Ways you can help the @informationwar!