Everyone I don't like is literally Hitler, Except me

There have been many events lately that suggest a global hitleresque type governments is on it's way in the post industrial economies. I am not speaking of conspiracy theories-fun as they may be. Nor am I talking about big tech trying to become a government.

For years, and until recently. the United states had fed upon the propaganda that we are the good guys, the defenders of democracy and promotors of human rights across the world. That we have build up our country based upon our historic ties to England. We've lied to [most] vets saying they defended freedom, and as they lost friends in our needless wars, many of them hold onto that delusion because that is the only crutch they have to make sense of it.

When it comes to the potential war with Iran. the evil regimes I am speaking about are the United states and the united kingdom. Don't get me wrong, Iran has reportedly hitleresque policies too as they kill the gays and want to destroy Israel. Everyone is literally Hitler.

As much as I like trump, the United states has too many problems. It started when the courts took away the byte in section 1983 claims. Mind you the anti-kkk act was supposed to have bite, it was supposed to be used against government actors-the part that targeted private businesses were struck down as unconstitutional in the civil rights cases of 1883-but was successful under the civil rights act under the commerce clause in the hotel atlanta case. The 1883 cases did recognize that civil rights are property rights. Property rights, and thus your civil rights, are protected under the 5th amendment. The 5th amendment trumps sovereign immunity. But the courts have yet to merge these ideas. There have been calls for the courts to stop recognizing sovereign immunity in the dissent, but the majority and the congress failed listen.

Despite its ancient lineage, the doctrine of sovereign immunity is nothing but a judge-made rule that is sometimes favored 7 and sometimes disfavored.8 Its original reliance on the notion that a divinely ordained monarch "can do no wrong"9 is, of course, thoroughly discredited.lO

10 See, e. g., Nevada v. Hall, 440 U. S. 410, 415 (1979) (the fiction that the king could do no wrong "was rejected by the colonists when they declared its persistent threat to the impartial administration of justice has been repeatedly acknowledged and recognized.ll Thus, in Federal Housing Authority v. Burr, 309 U. S. 242, 245 (1940), we remarked on "the current disfavor of the doctrine of governmental immunity from suit." 12

12 Many legal scholars have been similarly critical of the doctrine. See, e. g., Comment, Sovereign Immunity-An Anathema to the "Constitutional Tort," 12 Santa Clara Law. 543, 553, and n. 60 (1972) (collecting authorities); Cramton, Nonstatutory Review of Federal Administrative Action: The Need for Statutory Reform of Sovereign Immunity, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, and Parties Defendant, 68 Mich. L. Rev. 387,418-419 (1970); Davis, supra n. 11; Pugh, supra n. 11, at 494.

-United States v. Nordic Village, Inc., 503 U.S. 30 (1992) (dissent)

Rather than suing the state, a person used to be able to sue the state official for harm to get around it. A lockean when a magistrate acts outside of his authority, he ceases to be a magistrate type idea.

Where-ever law ends, tyranny begins, if the law be transgressed to another’s harm; and whosoever in authority exceeds the power given him by the law, and makes use of the force he has under his command, to compass that upon the subject, which the law allows not, ceases in that to be a magistrate; and, acting without authority, may be opposed, as any other man, who by force invades the right of another.

-John Locke's the two treatises of civil government

It is simply an illegal act upon the part of a State official in attempting, by the use of the name of the State, to enforce a legislative enactment which is void because unconstitutional. If the act which the state Attorney General seeks to enforce be a violation of the Federal Constitution, the officer, in proceeding under such enactment, comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is, in that case, stripped of his official or representative character, and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct.

-Ex parte Young 209 US 123, 156 (1908) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/209/123/#156

Now sovereign immunity isn't so much a bad thing so long as there is a party to recover from. But obviously when the mistakes are many or substantial in magnitude, and the employees are getting a pittance to do a job the official liability route isn't the best mechanism in the world particularly when trying to obtain highly qualified employees. The courts started to recognized qualified immunity in Harland v fitzgeralds, which protected highly qualified governmental officials from suit. As a substitute, they allowed municipal liability in monell which created liability for local governmental unit that was part of a policy, practice, or custom but offers a defendant little to no recourse against a rogue employee-save for failure to train. And of course, almost no remedy when it is a state officer-including state officers doing a municipal's bidding. Given that municipalities can discriminate against smart people trying to become cops, the highly qualified employee has suddenly dropped to borderline of full blown retardation-The average IQ of a cop these days. About the only thing highly qualified means these days is a cop is accurate and deadly with a boom stick. So long as another prudent officer who has an IQ below Forest Gump, police officers have a license to do anything they so desire-including kill unarmed black Americans, and locking people up for protected political speech, and even starving them for over a year. The crown and its princes can do no wrong these days, and-as we recently seen in Memphis where 25 cops were injured in a protest/riot-the people are not taking this very well.

One of the things that encouraged Nazi Germany was the American Academic craze towards eugenics, and purging inferior genes from the gene pool. We've had a taste of that in our own courts-and we also see that it is coming back with impunity.

It is better for all the world if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11. Three generations of imbeciles are enough.
Buck v Bell 274 US 200 (1927) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/274/200/

We even see a return of this in the democratic circles this year, by a black democrat, to a level Klanswomen Margaret Sanger would be proud:

"Some kids are unwanted, so you kill them now or you kill them later. You bring them in the world unwanted, unloved, you send them to the electric chair. So, you kill them now or you kill them later"
-https://www.foxnews.com/politics/alabama-dem-opposing-abortion-bill-some-kids-are-unwanted-so-you-kill-them-now-or-you-kill-them-later

And judges have been immune to sterilizing kids deemed retarded against their will.

A mother filed a petition in affidavit form in an Indiana Circuit Court, a court of general jurisdiction under an Indiana statute, for authority to have her "somewhat retarded" 15-year-old daughter (a respondent here) sterilized, and petitioner Circuit Judge approved the petition the same day in an ex parte proceeding without a hearing and without notice to the daughter or appointment of a guardian ad litem. The operation was performed shortly thereafter, the daughter having been told that she was to have her appendix removed. About two years later, she was married, and her inability to become pregnant led her to discover that she had been sterilized. As a result, she and her husband (also a respondent here) filed suit in Federal District Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against her mother, the mother's attorney, the Circuit Judge, the doctors who performed or assisted in the sterilization, and the hospital where it was performed, seeking damages for the alleged violation of her constitutional rights....Held: The Indiana law vested in the Circuit Judge the power to entertain and act upon the petition for sterilization, and he is, therefore, immune from damages liability even if his approval of the petition was in error. (a) A judge will not be deprived of immunity because the action he took was in error, was done maliciously, or was in excess of his authority...
-https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/435/349/#tab-opinion-1952547

Also about 15 years ago, the courts let a woman die over her parents wishes in the USA. it was one of the few times, maybe the only time, I saw a military man take his oath seriously. He entered the medical facility hoping to prevent the murder of terri sciavo, but he instead was arrested. It was a time when the congress, both sides of the isle, tried to save her life, and removed the case from corrupt judge Greers court room into a federal court. But the federal courts chose to kill her too, as did the 11th circuit, and the scotus.

The cult of death is winning in the United states, ever since Griswold v Connecticut followed by Roe v wade. The people don't have a say, the elitist of the courts do. While some states are starting to ban abortion, other states are requiring the taxpayers fund them.

The country of Germany, for along period of time after the war, forbade abortions. They have quite a nasty past with under Nazi Germany, including forced abortions and eugenics and were hoping to avoid it. They have since started practicing abortions again.

-propaganda to kill the disabled man because of the costs to take care of him

The United states is continuing to discriminate against people on the basis of mental illness. Taking away their rights to speech, their rights to guns, their rights against self incrimination, their due process rights, their rights to be released from pre-trial detention-they can be forcefully medicated under court order in some circumstances. I think I previously blogged about how America is becoming a biocracy just like nazi germany. Red flag laws= discrimination.

Across the pond, and I don't mean China, the U.K. government is doing something that even the pro-abortion crowd in western civilizations should revolt against. It is something that we let China do without question, it would be quite suicidal to go after them militarily, and up until recently we wanted their dirt cheap goods so we didn't have the pollution here. Due to our friendly relationship with the UK, particularly as the situation heats up with Iran, the US probably won't put any pressure upon England to get's its act together.

In the past few years the U.K. has authorized hospitals to let little kids die against the wishes of the parents, when other countries opened their doors and their wallets to provide treatment. Among them included alfie evans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfie_Evans_case and Charlie Gard https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Gard_case . Your own government, whom you pay taxes upon taxes upon taxes to pay for national health care system not only tells you your kid isn't qualified to receive treatment but can't leave the country to receive treatment from medical professionals offering it. The NHS generally has no problem paying for elective procedures like abortions and boob jobs.

More recently, a pro-abortionist judge In England ruled that an intellectually disabled woman over her objections and the objections of her mother, that she was to be medically forced to have an abortion. The state not only ruled that a woman should have a medical procedure against her will, but that the government should kill her baby. https://www.foxnews.com/world/british-judge-orders-disabled-pregnant-woman-abortion

“I think she would like to have a baby in the same way she would like to have a nice doll.”
-Justice Nathalie Lieven

Lievan used to be an attorney for the abortion lobby, like most retarded attorneys she went on to become a judge and assert their own agenda.

anti-semetic attacks are also on the rise in the US and in Europe.

I know I am jumping right to Godwins law, skipping all the prior discourse, in saying that what is going on in the world is all heading back to Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, ever so slowly the monster that the world defeated some 70+ years ago is creeping back. Only it will not be centralized to one country. It is emerging all over the world. For the most part these aren't things being done by the legislatures, but by the courts and the administrative agencies. The courts have generally taken away all peaceful remedies at law. Hopefully there is still time for an appeal over in the u.k. If you were to hold yourself up to a God, the option isn't a matter of choosing whether or not you want a judge to live, or the unborn child of an intellectually disabled woman. The judges [and officials] will continuously repeat these abuses and expand upon them unless and until they are stopped, and these judges of death ought to be condemned to the very death they condemn others to. As we see from the United states, our congress is too inept to stop them here-and i doubt the parliament is competence enough to starve them there.

Guns even knives are banned in much of England. In parts of the United states, guns are banned as well and there are actors hoping to expand the gun bans. Reportedly Hitler too had a gun registry, then he confiscated all the guns.

What is to be done about this. Well you can speak up about it, but over in the UK they'll just laugh at you since they already banned your guns, your knives, your scissors-heck even your spoons. The true answer, my friend, would be criminal to speak it, and you won't have a future thereafter. The other alternatives is to stop paying taxes and deprive them of power to destroy peoples lives, but watch them take away your more of your things or lock you up. Another alternative is to leave these countries, and warn others what is coming, ask them to stop doing trade with these countries. When you leave these oppressive regimes, leave instructions online allowing for those who stayed the relevant information to rise up and rebel.

Gunmetal, also known as red brass in the United States, is a type of bronze – an alloy of copper, tin, and zinc. Proportions vary but 88% copper, 8–10% tin, and 2–4% zinc is an approximation.
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunmetal

-king of random. Homemade Gunpowder, For Science!
--Grant Thompson of king of random was charged for making a dry ice bomb.
---reportedly got deal to drop charges https://www.tubefilter.com/2018/05/21/grant-thompson-king-of-random/
----I imagine the king of random hasn't been demonetized on youtube (I don't want them demonetized)
-----youtube: making bombs good; antifa good;free speech bad; Orange man bad.
cough potassium nitrate (75%), charcoal(15%), and sulfur(10%) by weight-at least for fireworks.

Of course this isn't enough information to do anything, except stir the debate to make the elitist realize their own mortality and delusions and to cut the crap before the people they thought they disarmed rebel.

source:wikipedia:yellow jacket