Sort:  

Should I have asked for the exact number to which law they were trying to get me on or should I asked if they were violating my 4th amendment or what?

You should have asked for their proof that you agreed to be their slave.
They cannot present proof of their jurisdiction over you unless you agree to let them have it.
You did that when you failed to make them provide proof to back up their claim.

Watch @marcstevens' videos, he will explain it.

It's an unusual topic, because we all have the assumption that statutes apply to us. Marc's techniques are the best I've seen in this form of unusual legal defence.

They worked for me in the past and i expect to use them in future corrective actions.

Marc definitely has 'em in the corner.
If you get a criminal judge, which is likely, it is harder.
Say the right words and you get paid for being disturbed by their erroneous agent.

Some police can fail to have logic. Some cops may falsely assume you are possibly resisting arrest, not cooperating, or whatever they may call it, allegedly, when you go to ask them that question, for prove of the consent of being a slave of them apart from driver license identification documents (I.D.) assuming that documents, birth certificates, degrees, paper, etc, are consents, contracts, to the slavery, to the whatever people want to call it. In other words, police chiefs may know this but the foot soldiers, the pawns, may not always get it. So, we can ask them. We can say stuff to cops and other people. We may red-pill some of them. We may get some of them to get it. But be careful as some cops may not get it. Some cops may react immaturely, prematurely, falsely, illegally, or whatever.

You might beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride.
Famous pig squeal.

It's important to file a risk management claim when the charges are dropped.
If you are the first in the state, or your judge is a criminal one, expect to have to appeal the first ruling.
You can file an interlocutory appeal, but only if you know how.

You can read the rules online, but getting them applied is up to you.
I got denied falsely on procedural grounds for my interlocutory, but the da got right when i talked to him after that because they did not want my issue to get accepted to the court of appeals.
I signed to a misdemeanor with no fines and no more time, after looking at 20+ year felonies.
Using the marcratic method.

I call that a near win.

I need to learn more about that. Beyond that, a lot of people should know about these things. So, I think about that sometimes. I think about education, about the art of getting other people interested in learning about these things, how the law works, how to make deals, how to win.

Well, use it in court a time or two, traffic tickets are recommended, and start freeing people from the oppressive arm of rule by force, eh?

This is a monkey wrench that can stop the machine.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.12
JST 0.029
BTC 60896.89
ETH 3361.32
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.49