You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem Flag Rewards: Quick Intro and Jury Selection
have a greater reputation than 17
If someone has reputation less than defualt 25, then it is likely indicator that they either comitted some abuse and were flagged by steemcleaners or were flagged by some users.
I would recommend jurors to have at least rep 50, to make sure that they have got at least some understanding and experience of Steemit.
Solid copy. A lot of honest people don't have that high of a rep because they don't use bid bots or self-vote. I think we lower the bar to maybe 45. In many cases, a persons rep isn't really achieved through meritorious means. Take the freesteem vote farmers.
I have some concerns about the scammers attempt to infiltrate the process. If we go the juror route, it will likely be on discord and a few of us will review the candidate jurors activity on steemd for any ill behavior. One definitive reason anyone will be barred is hate flagging. Not going to be involved with that. Not even a hint.
Steem is decentralized but I'm not sure that there is any way to have a position of trust with a centralized approving mechanism. It surely is a conundrum as I see it.
But yeah greater than 17 rep. That's a no brainer. You're absolutely right.