Korea’s real problem is that there is no exit

in #investing3 days ago

This week, the head of South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service delivered one of the most remarkable statements of the entire AI-driven market boom. Lee Chan-jin publicly admitted that regulators had moved too quickly in approving leveraged ETFs linked to Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, said he personally regretted not doing more to stop them and confirmed that authorities are now considering stabilisation measures. The comments amounted to a rare public acknowledgment that the country’s financial watchdog is becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the consequences of a rally it helped facilitate.

The most important part of the story, however, was the implicit recognition that the authorities may no longer be able to reverse course without triggering the very crisis they are trying to avoid. After encouraging retail investors to pour borrowed money into leveraged products linked to Korea’s dominant AI beneficiaries, regulators now find themselves confronting a market in which millions of households, tens of trillions of won in margin debt and a significant portion of national wealth have become dependent on continuously rising prices.

This is what happens when speculation evolves into policy. The original objective was straightforward: attract capital back to Korea, strengthen domestic markets and reduce money flowing into U.S. equities. The problem is that success created a new dependency. Restrict leverage now and investors could suffer large losses, confidence in the market could collapse and policymakers would be blamed for destroying the very rally they helped create. Allow leverage to continue expanding and the risks become even larger.

The new reality is that South Korea appears to have entered a stage where every available option carries significant costs. The market watchdog is issuing warnings, brokerages are monitoring risks more closely and regulators are discussing stabilisation measures, yet none of these actions address the underlying problem that the system has become heavily concentrated in a handful of AI-related stocks financed by record levels of retail borrowing. Once millions of investors begin treating leverage as a path to wealth, reducing leverage becomes politically and economically difficult.

Perhaps that is why the regulator’s comments were so extraordinary. They sounded less like the warnings of an institution confidently managing a market and more like the concerns of an institution discovering that it has lost much of its room to maneuver.

Bildschirmfoto 2026-06-23 um 08.04.15.png

Related sources:
https://www.kedglobal.com/policy/newsView/ked202606230001
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/south-korea-watchdog-regrets-rushed-launch-leveraged-etfs-considering-measures-2026-06-22/
https://www.tradingview.com/news/reuters.com,2026:newsml_L1N42U071:0-south-korea-market-watchdog-offers-rare-mea-culpa-over-leveraged-etfs/