You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Jeff Berwick Breaks Deal for Galt's Gulch Chile Transparency, Calls me "Little Maggot"
Try this. Berwick offered to send partial information and only if it was kept confidential, in violation of the agreement he made with Donnelly. Donnelly insisted Berwick not weasel out of their agreement. Somehow, Berwick sends nothing whatsoever despite the fact that he admits he has Donnelly's email address. Berwick adds insult to injury.
Is it clear now?
Sir, with a case in court still ongoing, it would seem prudent to keep matters confidential until the case is resolved.
I don't understand why you declined to accept ANYthing offered at all if you said there you were interested in uncovering the whole truth.
Confidentiality would not be prudent at all. A strong community requires honesty and accountability, not cowering behind bullshit excuses.
As for the case, it will continue to be "ongoing" for as long as these silly gringos are willing to keep paying Chilean lawyers.
Why are you telling me this? Go tell Jeff. He agreed to the deal.
I'll accept anything he sends me. He has my email address and admitted as much in the transcript.
His former business partner has had no trouble in reaching me via email. He sends me new documents daily, without me having to promise him anything in return or create videos.
However, again, I won't let him weasel out of our agreement by sending a couple documents and then trying to claim he fulfilled the agreement. I demand full compliance because that's what we agreed to. Therefore, that's what I'm entitled to.
If someone agreed to provide you with a dozen eggs and you knew this person was unreliable, would you accept half a dozen? You'd be a fool not to take a stand and demand the full delivery. Otherwise, you're leaving the door open to being ripped off.