Wisdom gaining is something everyone can accomplish. It's a lot of hard work though and it needs iterations in order to get used to that state of mind and heart. Wisdom can be gained by information AND the acknowledgment of feelings. You can't be wise without feelings. To feel good or bad about something is an indicator of the inner human world and once you do not push feelings away as something irrational and therefore not countable they won't leak through subconscious beliefs and (destructive) actions/ behavior you do not even know about.

It's good to be irrational and it's also good to be aware of your irrationality because you cannot avoid it anyway but practice to stay awake to it.

I wonder why you don't connect ethics to wisdom resp. don't use that term. From an ethical standpoint, which includes the physicality of your body, wisdom can be approached easier as through bending to a technology alone. Knowledge is not only mind related.

I have the impression that you think people aren't smart enough to find solutions for future generations when they are NOT relying on your concept of a computer-based eco-cortex. But as we are having bodies we need to be embedded in nature and not in technology. There are smart permaculture solutions for food production out there and renaturation projects which I assume you do know of. There are solutions for bio- and technical cycles like the cradle-to-cradle concept. Once you are interested in how to protect human and nature overall, connect it to universal ethics you'll find all the information of best practice examples still by using the searching function.

From what I think we as humans don't need even further distance between us and the production of what it's needed for a living but to come closer again to the processes of making materials ourselves and growing food and so on. How do you relate to my critique?

Maybe I get an answer this time?