Boom! End Game Nears As Central Banks Buying Up Gold Mining Companies

in #money8 years ago

When you watch mainstream media or listen to central bankers, gold is constantly deemed to be the redheaded stepchild of the investment industry.

Just that alone, is unbelievable, considering that gold has been one of the best performing investments of the 21st century. On December 31st, 1999, gold closed at $290.25. As of today it is trading at $1327.80.

That is a percentage gain in the last 16 years of 357%! Compare that to the Dow Jones, which closed the 20th century at 11497 and currently is at 18085 for a gain of only 57.3%.

If there is a business sector or financial asset class that has outperformed gold in the last 16 years, I can't think of one... yet, aside from your crazy neighbor with a bomb shelter or a few people who read The Dollar Vigilante, how many people do you know who not only are aware of what a fabulous investment gold has been and also own some?

Meanwhile, central banksters like Alan Greenspan call gold a "barbarous relic" and Ben Bernanke has opined that gold is not money and the only reason central banks hold it is because of “long-term tradition. ”

And so, it was with great interest... shock actually... that I came across this headline, "Switzerland and Norway Begin to Massively Accumulate Precious Metals Mining Shares".

It outlines how the central banks of both Norway and Switzerland have been buying up nearly $1 billion worth of gold mining stocks!

Well, isn't that interesting!

The moves of these banks are noteworthy not for their strategies, but because they are indicative of the perilous state of the world’s financial and monetary systems.

Central banks have sold gold regularly over the years, probably as part of a larger propaganda campaign to convince the public that gold and silver don’t matter anymore. (And there’s another reason I will get to in a moment.)

If central banks are starting to become so worried about the state of the world economy that they are willing to reverse an obvious manipulative meme, that’s something to take quite seriously.

For central banks to buy gold in 2016 is akin to what we have often called a Jubilee Jolt – a surprise move that emphasizes the seriousness of the crisis that is now upon us.

Certainly, these purchases go against the grain of traditional – modern – central bank investment activism. The Swiss central bank, for instance, campaigned against a Swiss referendum to back the franc with gold, but now seems to be far more supportive of the yellow metal.

Throughout the latter stages of the 20th century and into the 21st, central banks have disgorged gold with varying degrees of enthusiasm.

Britain managed to sell a good deal of gold at the turn of the century near gold’s all-time low against the dollar.

And much more recently, Canada managed to sell the remnants of its gold stock.

Of course, other central bank gold transactions are shrouded in mystery. Both France and Germany recently wanted to repatriate gold from the US and ran into a good deal of difficulty doing so.

And when it comes to the US itself, the size of the nation’s gold stock remains similarly mysterious. In fact, for decades, there has been speculation that US gold supposedly doesn’t exist, or that what remains is gold of a most inferior kind.

It is impossible to say with any surety what resides in Fort Knox because no audit has taken place for more than half-a-century. But now pressure may rise on the US government to confirm gold holdings.

Here, from ZeroHedge:

Both banks are being reported to have printed close to $1 billion dollars of fiat money as of recently. This should come as no shock to anyone, as this is all Central Banks know how to do – print money. What is more stunning, however, is where they immediately moved these funds. You guessed it right – into precious metals.

They know that the physical precious metals market is limited, tight, and scarce. They also know that if they simply printed $1 billion worth of fiat money out of thin air and moved it into physical, then they would risk blowing the market apart, sending prices potentially catapulting higher.

Since they are not yet willing to face the wrath of the other Central Bankers around the world, they did the next best thing. They bought shares in the gold mines themselves.

The article points out what we have mentioned before, that central bank disgorgement of gold never seemed to make much sense. But not trusting anything that central banks do, I wonder if gold sales were in part aimed at building up the BRICS stores of gold and silver.

Russia and China in particular have been aggressive buyers of gold and it is certainly possible that sales were engineered to provide liquidity to the market and to ensure additional economic leverage accrued to BRICS countries.

In addition to China buying physical bullion, they have also made strategic moves to supersede western commodities exchanges. Back in April, the Shanghai gold exchange launched a new benchmark price fix for the metal to challenge the long established, Rothschild created, benchmark in London as well as the COMEX exchange in New York.

China isn't the only country in Asia leveling the playing field. In July, Japan's TOCOM exchange announce a new physical market for gold where market participants can trade gold in futures and physical at more transparent prices.

As we’ve pointed out numerous times, Western elites are working overtime to “even out” the economies of developing and developed countries. In fact, this is one of the reasons for the creation of the BRICS – to make clear that there is a formalized alternative to Western economies.

It should be clear to anyone who examines the position of the BRICS closely – especially China – that Western powers have played an extraordinary role in elevating the industrial might of these countries.

The idea of course is to facilitate further globalism and eventually world government. But presumably not all central banks are eager to support this strategy at the expense of their own solvency.

In other words, central banks may have been content to sell gold in the past, but now faced with an oncoming financial hurricane they are having second thoughts – as well they should.

In fact it may have occurred to central bankers that the solvency of their own institutions has been purposefully jeopardized because a global central bank will likely have little need for local and regional ones.

As usual, we've been ahead of the curve and owned gold and gold stocks since 2001.

TDV's Senior Analyst, Ed Bugos, is one of the most highly respected analysts in the entire sector. Some of the gold stocks that the central banks have been buying are the same gold stocks which Ed Bugos has been recommending, in various forms, since 2001 (when he recognized the gold bull market began before almost anyone else).

Ed is up 200% in the last year in the TDV Premium portfolio (click here to subscribe to get access to this info) and many of his mining picks have generated extraordinary returns as well.

It is getting to be VERY interesting times when central banks are counterfeiting their own currencies and buying gold mining stocks with the proceeds! We've been buying gold and gold stocks for years because we knew we'd arrive at this point in time when things started to get crazy. The craziness has just begun, by the way, and there is still a long way to go and we expect gold and gold stocks to be much, much higher in the next few years.

But, now you know, even the central bankers seem to think that things will get so crazy that they are buying gold mining stocks for the same reasons as us... to try to survive through the coming collapse and to also profit from it.

Sort:  

It's great that you include the fact that the globalists have propped up the BRICS alliance to eventually play both sides off against each other in classic ordo-ab-chao fashion. I feel dissappointed when I read stuff from veterans in this field actually getting all orgasmic over BRICS and Russia. Great work Jeff :)

Great article! We have some interesting years ahead!

Let's see in what kind of Shmitah we are in ;)

Also, noticed you are powering up big time! Good for you! Wish I had the resources to do so as well at these prices!

Funny dudes, these central bankers. Alan Greenspan was a goldbug prior to heading the Fed and now that he's out, he's advocating for gold again.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-27/greenspan-warns-crisis-imminent-he-urges-return-gold-standard

And former Bank of England president Mervyn King has become cozy with gold as well:
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article55451.html

What is obvious to me is that these guys will say and do things while in official capacity that they may or may not necessarily personally agree with. Could you imagine these guys recommending gold while they were still in power?

And Bernanke, when asked by Ron Paul during a congressional hearing why the Fed is keeping gold in its reserves, paused and then said it's because of "tradition." HAHAHAHAHAHA! Very Funny, indeed.

You (greenspan) must be f ing kidding me....

It looks like he's far from an Objectivist these days; Pretty much all over the place with his economic and political positions.

These type of assets are the only sector in the market that aren't totally overvalued currently. Agree with Jeff completely

@dollarviglante love what you're doing on Steemit but I urge you to post more real content that you can't find anywhere else. The platform can only get so far with content like this that can be found elsewhere -- we need #realness that can't be found anywhere else: https://steemit.com/protocols/@ntomaino/the-real-opportunity-for-a-social-network-with-monetary-incentives-built-in

I disagree. @dollarvigilante is referencing stories (citing his information) and putting it together for his own conclusion. That alone becomes "real content". He's not C&P from other locations and calling it his own. I found it a unique take on information found elsewhere.

he is providing us his interpretation of it, providing further analysis, which may be valuable...shit, I think he's cute! <3

@notmaino You can't offend me, it's impossible. So, don't worry. Only libtards and weak men get "offended". ;)

if you say so :)

I can see you have skill in the marketing of "what people want to read" @dollarvigilante. Yes it may be searchable content...but I feel that you are providing further analysis in well-written form. If I want to know about #money...I keep @dollarvigilante on my feed...also I love a good debate. I think your ideas on anarchism are revolutionary in a good way, however, I do feel you lack in originality...not in work, presentation, nor value. I do not think that the spirit of steemit is to keep pure originality. Literally, a market-based environment dictates that if people like you, you will get a following of votes....

@dollarvigilante A idiot will always try and bring you down to there level and beat you with experience! Thanks for the article very interest and much appreciated!

100,000+ people care about my real content with my thoughts/opinions... So, in that sense, this is quite "real" content... no one else can offer the opinions I offer (simply because they are not me).

i hear you. i view the potential of a social network with monetary incentives as much more than just a platform where you post your standard content though. and in order for it to be succesful, it needs to be more than that imho

Well, I have, by far, the most followers on the site... doesn't that indicate I am providing wanted content? http://steemwhales.com/?p=1&s=followers

I'm not arguing that you're not providing wanted content. In fact, I started my comment by saying I love what you're doing on Steemit.

I'm just suggesting this feels like content directly from your newsletter and in order for this community to really grow we need truly unique, real content you can't find elsewhere.

My intention wasn't to offend you. Carry on.

@ntomaino Oh, I misunderstood then... you are saying because I also post this on my site that is an issue... well, I thought about that and I post it first on Steem and don't even promote my own website anywhere... so, in essence, I've really moved the TDV blog to Steem. I even advertise my Steem posts on FB (to bring more people to Steemit). I also post a lot of extra and other content as well that I don't post anywhere else.

after reading further down, I see your larger point here...like I said, I love a good debate, I could go either way on this :D

Bullion over the past 5 years is really not that impressive!

As an actual red-headed stepchild, I should let you know that the marijuana industry is doing quite well. Maybe the price per gram has dropped, but volume is at an all time high. (Hehe)

Thanks Jeff for another really interesting post. I don't always agree with you, but you always get me thinking. You actually inspired my latest post!

Maybe (just maybe at this point, because I don’t yet take to this idea like a duck to water just yet) the idea that we are on the brink of giant financial collapse is not fixed in stone, it’s just one of the options. Either way, worrying about it is not going to prevent any economic collapse, and nor is it going to do any of us any good. I’m one of Jeff Berwick’s @dollarvigilante many followers and I certainly take into account what he’s saying. But let’s face it, I’m not going to flee to South America (I already live in New Zealand) and if whatever I choose to focus on makes that possible future more likely, I’d rather choose to focus on what I want rather that what @dollarvigilante fears.
So here is my thought for the day, and it’s very new one for me – what if the “coming financial meltdown is no more real than “global warming”?

https://steemit.com/steemit/@sift666/it-s-beyond-our-control

It is also possible that Russia and China hoard gold because it is
convenient to use in corruption . For example do you believe that the Chinese gold is in the vault of the Chinese Central Bank or Chinese Communist Party vault?

I am and have been for long time a strong advocate for buying gold. The world money system is under extreme pressure and will collapse at some point. The question is when?