🎛️ Music Production Talk: The Magic of EQ'ing

in #musicproduction6 years ago (edited)

Fellow Steemians! I hope this post finds you all well and good!

Today, I want to talk about the magic of EQ'ing. This magical, mysterious tip will get you EQ'ing your music like a pro. Boy do I tell you, when you hear this, it's going to flip your world of music production upside down. I get questions all the time about EQ'ing; how to EQ kicks, how to EQ vocals, is this EQ better than that EQ (sometimes it is)? And here is the mystical, wonderous, one-statement answer to it all...

There is no magic. It's just EQ'ing.
Capture16.JPG

Now, okay, joke's over. EQ'ing is a crazy helpful tool for getting rid of unwanted frequencies, and giving little boosts to those that need it. However, I feel that sometimes novice producers get caught up in this imaginary 'magic' - this algorithmic perfection of sparkling, crispy high's and punchy, boomy lows - that makes their audio sound like that of the million dollar studio.

That's just it, you're not in a million dollar studio with a million dollar mind (yet), so you likely won't get that product. Back in my earlier days, when I compared my music to that of the big labels and such, I thought my compression/EQ'ing was the problem. Why isn't my track as punchy, and crisp, and beautifully dirty?

I spent hours compressing and EQ'ing away, until I had these muddy, harsh, uncontrolled sounds rendered useless by insane EQ curves and compression that was pushed way too hard. Nine times out of ten, it was never my EQ'ing that was the problem, it was just the source sound and the mix as a whole. Not only were their sound designers far more experienced and precise, but their audio sources (generators, synths, microphones, etc.) were just far better (and more expensive) to the point where they could do much less with greater results.

TLDR; EQ'ing doesn't help a poopy sound.

So where do we go from there? First of all, let's talk about what an EQ does.

An EQ is essentially a very dynamic 'volume' where you are able to control the levels of frequency bandwidths specifically. You can also filter out (which is why EQ's can sometimes be referred to as 'filters' as well) unwanted frequencies. Let's pick apart some of that jibberish I just sputtered.

Frequency is essentially a vibration, that we hear as sound. We measure frequency in hertz (hz). The higher the vibration, or the higher the frequency, the higher the pitch of the sound. The loudness of frequencies is what we control in an EQ.

A bandwidth is a range of frequencies. They can be narrow, or wide. You hear this in reference to how you may be treating a specific 'bandwidth' on an EQ.

When looking at an EQ, you have any number of parameters that can be used to 'EQ' (or filter) your sound. In the case of the Parametric EQ 2 (from FL Studio), we have 7 parameters for EQ'ing. The low-end (bass frequencies) is on the left, up through the mid-range to the high frequencies on the right.

Capture15.JPG

Here are some tips regarding EQ'ing that might help!

  • Not all sounds are present throughout the full harmonic spectrum (that's white noise), so first find out where the sound actually lives. Not all EQ actions are going to give you an 'equal' effect. A +6db low-shelf on a hi-hat isn't really going to do much of anything good for you, because a hihat is mostly high-end freqencies. A +6db high shelf on a hihat is a totally, totally different outcome. Just because were talking about the same gain, it doesn't make the end result equal. Know where your sound lives and act accordingly.

  • Cut before you boost. I've actually mentioned this one before here on Steemit, so to quote myself: "When EQ'ing, it's easy to find yourself making big ol' frequency spikes because it might sound better in the moment and/or solo'd out. However, do this to 20-30 channels and now you have kind of a mess on your hands. If you've already established a decent mix, doing this is going to affect it, sometimes negatively. However, cutting unneeded frequencies can simultaneously retain a good mix and remove unwanted clutter/muddiness."

  • A rule of thumb in the mixing world is you should never go beyond +/- 6db in either direction, or something like that. I say to hell with rules, but they're onto something from a philosophical standpoint. The idea is that if you have to adjust something that harshly, you might want to take a step back and re-analyze where and why the sound is where it is in your mix in the first place. Something with such a steep adjustment may come back to haunt you later on, so just have a game plan; have calculated reasons.

  • EQ'ing is relative (as is music universally, in my opinion). Remember that when mastering, everything is normalized (ideally) to 0db. This means if you want heavy-ass bass, adding a s**t-ton of low end isn't going to help you. It's just going to make everything else super quiet in comparison when mastered. I'll give you a simple example. If we're talking on a scale of 1-10 regarding the lows, mids, and highs of a master, ideally you want everything 10/10/10, right? Well, kicking your low-end up to a 14 only means that when mastering, the whole thing has to be lowered by 4 to prevent clipping. So your end result winds up as a 10/6/6. Your bass doesn't become stronger, everything else just becomes weaker. Mark missed. Essentially, balance is everything.

  • There are no universal truths in EQ'ing. Because an EQ sounds good on your voice, it may or may not sound good on someone else's. Every sound recording is different, so use your ears to determine what kind of EQ'ing is going to help you get a clean sound, and never just 'preset' your process.

Not to beat a dead horse, but practice is what gets you from A to B. But it's also really important not to be fooled by this illusion of 'magical' techniques (in other words, attributing fantastic sound to methods that don't make sense). EQ'ing, compression, or any other production methods can't save a sound that wasn't decent to begin with. Just doing things for the sake of doing them doesn't help (the old 'polished turd' proverb if you will, you know the one). A better course of action is understanding what an EQ actually does for you, using it to your advantage, and producing within your means.

I'll sound like a million dollar producer when you put me in a million dollar studio. But for now, I make due pretty darn well with just kinda knowing how some s**t works, and you will too.


SLMSBanner.png
You can join the 'Steemit Local Music Society' here:

Click here to join on Discord.


You can follow me and my tunes on Steemit/Choon/Dsound:

@harrisonmir


Sort:  

Your post was manually selected and voted for by @illuminati-inc (IINC) with support of @curie. About IINC: here. About Curie: here.

Thanks so much for the love and recognition. Very much appreciated!

I have to agree. When I discovered the power of EQing it was a double edged sword - here was this amazing way to dramatically alter every track but at the same time you can easily over do it and end up with a mess!

As a vocalist it has taken me about a year to find the best settings for my voice and now I have a template with the EQ values preset so I can pretty much record and go. Sure I could spend a bit more time tweaking each song but as you say I can't expect to create the same product as a million dollar studio so I'm happy with the way it is!

I can't even tell you how many tracks I've botched up that way 😆. But they were valuable learning experiences so all is right. And yeah totally, I never 'blame my tools' so to speak, I think there is a lot we can do as independent producers. You can still get a phenomenal, yet modest, product with just know-how. But sometimes you just can't fake some of the gear they're running in there.

Indeed. I always find it hard to know if I have reached the limits of my equipment or the limits of my skills!

Haha I totally understand that feeling, sometimes it's a rather blurry line, ey? 😆

Yeah and a little frustrating as you try to eek out that last 5% and realise the next day that you've made it sound worse! :P

Loading...

With you completely on EQ. I love it actually and good to see another FL Studio user - power to the Loops :D

Para EQ2 is one of my go to plug-ins for every project, so versatile and the point about every sound is different is vital for any new producers to understand.

The last 2 years, I've started using the EQ more and more and each time I send tracks off to get mastered, the studio notice improvements in the mixdown and when I listen back to earlier tracks, it does show that practice makes perfect.

Anyway, great article, well written and funny too, take it easy.

Nicky
(Drum & Bass Producer)

Nice dude, that's awesome. And thanks!

I was actually just checking you out on Choon just yesterday. Awesome music dude, very clean and well put-together.

Great to meet you, cheers!

Ah thanks a lot man, I appreciate that and glad you enjoyed the music. You have a choon link as well? Send it over this way :)

Awsome article!

Thanks @sotirovmusic, much appreciated! Welcome!

Man! So very true.. some one once told me eq is more about what you take out rather that what you add, obviously this is not all cases but it kind of makes I think. And yeah I find my self constantly comparing my work to the stuff listen to and sometimes it gets ya down ... kinda like “why can’t I get my track to sound like that” but in reality the stuff I’m listening to is usually the result of expensive equipment/experienced engineers and all the tricks of the trade which probably take years and years to learn. Great post mate, love getting your insight on music production

some one once told me eq is more about what you take out rather that what you add

Absolutely man, well put, and I totally agree. And thanks a lot @thomasrobertgent! Appreciate you reading my word-heaving! 😆

Good solid advice here, especially as far as prioritizing mastery of subtractive EQ before going ham with additive. Get yourself a fabfilter pro-q btw. I have just about abandoned all my other eq plugins and will frequently use it clinically over my outboard API eqs. Rad UI as well.

Dude I've heard great things about that guy, definitely going to have to make a purchase sooner rather than later!

+1 for fabfilter pro-q2 - always my goto eq when not going for color

Beautiful post and explanation of EQ.

I find it is always useful when layering sounds on top of each other, weather it be bass or high frequencies. Sort of helping to carve and separate the sounds to blend in with one another.

Absolutely dude I agree. Separation and simplicity really helps. Sometimes I'll use much simpler EQ sort of educationally (like 3-band vs 7), just to limit my options and really focus on balancing what's there. Specifics and that sort of 'free-reign' EQ'ing can become real crazy, real quick.

Thanks for stopping by!

Nice write-up. Cutting is for cleaning, boosting is for colouring is pretty much what I live by. I can strongly recommend "Mixing Audio" by Roey Izhaki for people want to read more. There's a really good section about EQing, which I use for my students.

Nice @askeb definitely going to have to look that up! And yeah I like that quote there, very accurate.

@harrisonmir You have received a 100% upvote from @taginspector because this post did not use any bidbots and you have not used bidbots in the last 30 days!

Upvoting this comment will help keep this service running.