I think that we should make the owners of the human/bot/spammer list as well as the owners of Ginabot aware of Musing, in order for them to prevent this from happening. It's no fair that Musing users suffer from losing "Human ranking" by participating here.
That's scary. I had to go and check my sincerity score right away. Nothing seemed to have changed on my end, but who knows how it will look tomorrow. Thanks for pointing that out.
Thanks for the reply. I just found out about this change and wanted to know what others think. It's definitely going to change my behavior since, as you pointed out, it forces me to keep Musing.io open more often.
Well, they do have the money, I mean, they get paid regardless if people like it or not. But good to know it's not easy to infiltrate. They tried it with Bitcoin, by buying a lot and then deleting it, but that is a totally different blockchain. But that it is still possible concerns me, but good that it's not easy.
To explain my question in more details. Well, the government is never ready to give up its power, and they are now already fighting Bitcoin because it's becoming a threat for the banks, and for paying taxes because it's anonymous. But with Steemit, the creators can do a Fork or whatever it's called, and change the nature of the system. So my question was, can the government intervene like they are trying to do with Bitcoin, and bribe or threaten the creators of Steemit to change the rules in the Governments favor. Or is there no danger of that happening.
thanks @broken.akay for the explanation. now i understand about your question.
The goverments will never be able to change the steemit rules in their favor. Blockchain is democracy, and "a fork" can be held after voting (ah i mean winesses).
If the government makes posting illegal tomorrow, Steemit will be illegal, so it will stop its existence. That is pretty extreme I know, but because its a democracy, doesn't mean it can't be influenced. But I see what you mean, yeah.
View this question on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
I think that we should make the owners of the human/bot/spammer list as well as the owners of Ginabot aware of Musing, in order for them to prevent this from happening. It's no fair that Musing users suffer from losing "Human ranking" by participating here.
That's scary. I had to go and check my sincerity score right away. Nothing seemed to have changed on my end, but who knows how it will look tomorrow. Thanks for pointing that out.
View this answer on Musing.io
I think we're pretty much on the same page. I'm not a fan, but I'm not against it, either since the pros and cons pretty much balance each other out.
View this answer on Musing.io
Thanks for the reply. I just found out about this change and wanted to know what others think. It's definitely going to change my behavior since, as you pointed out, it forces me to keep Musing.io open more often.
View this question on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
See this article: https://steemit.com/witness-category/@cervantes/witness-consensus-status-to-fix-the-actual-steem-s-economic-flows-eng
View this answer on Musing.io
View this question on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this question on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this question on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this question on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
Well, they do have the money, I mean, they get paid regardless if people like it or not. But good to know it's not easy to infiltrate. They tried it with Bitcoin, by buying a lot and then deleting it, but that is a totally different blockchain. But that it is still possible concerns me, but good that it's not easy.
View this answer on Musing.io
To explain my question in more details. Well, the government is never ready to give up its power, and they are now already fighting Bitcoin because it's becoming a threat for the banks, and for paying taxes because it's anonymous. But with Steemit, the creators can do a Fork or whatever it's called, and change the nature of the system. So my question was, can the government intervene like they are trying to do with Bitcoin, and bribe or threaten the creators of Steemit to change the rules in the Governments favor. Or is there no danger of that happening.
thanks @broken.akay for the explanation. now i understand about your question.
The goverments will never be able to change the steemit rules in their favor. Blockchain is democracy, and "a fork" can be held after voting (ah i mean winesses).
If the government makes posting illegal tomorrow, Steemit will be illegal, so it will stop its existence. That is pretty extreme I know, but because its a democracy, doesn't mean it can't be influenced. But I see what you mean, yeah.
View this question on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this question on Musing.io
View this question on Musing.io
View this question on Musing.io