I do not want to argue with you!Once you determine the authorship of the image on metadata,what can you say about the author of this photo: Who is the author of this image?(As an example)
It appears to me you dont understand what metadata means,
your image doesnt have any metadata, his does, its impossible that he stole it from you. :)
How could Alex have stolen the image from you?, if your publication of it doesnt contain metadata, if he stole it, it would have no metadata either, but his does. I really doubt Alex stole the picture from you and added metadata to publish it on fotokto.ru which doesnt pays,
you are a serial plagiarist and you are at the end of your rope.
Creative Commons: If you are posting content under a Creative Commons license, please attribute and link according to the specific license. If you are posting content under CC0 or Public Domain please consider noting that at the end of your post.
Not indicating that the content you copy/paste is not your original work could be seen as plagiarism.
I have previously published articles without source so how was new user for this ,cheetah earlier ban me!At the present time I publish only original content.Not to understand what you are accusing me of plagiarism?
I'm not going to anything to anyone to prove! One day I defended my position but I was again accused of plagiarism ...
My omission that I did not put a label on my photo @favorit before being published on the Internet.
You are lying to me, I know because your picture doesnt have metadata and his does,
he is the original author of the photo
I do not want to argue with you!Once you determine the authorship of the image on metadata,what can you say about the author of this photo:
Who is the author of this image?(As an example)
It appears to me you dont understand what metadata means,
your image doesnt have any metadata, his does, its impossible that he stole it from you. :)
How could Alex have stolen the image from you?, if your publication of it doesnt contain metadata, if he stole it, it would have no metadata either, but his does. I really doubt Alex stole the picture from you and added metadata to publish it on fotokto.ru which doesnt pays,
you are a serial plagiarist and you are at the end of your rope.
I know very well what is metadata and how they can be edited!)
In theory it could have been stolen from another source where the metadata was retained. Not claiming this happened though.
Not citing the source of photos(images) is plagiarism. Here is a post on why this is bad, and here is how easy it is to find allowed photos.
Creative Commons: If you are posting content under a Creative Commons license, please attribute and link according to the specific license. If you are posting content under CC0 or Public Domain please consider noting that at the end of your post.
Not indicating that the content you copy/paste is not your original work could be seen as plagiarism.
As the author mentioned, it's original.
By the way this author has been banned and unbanned by @cheetah in the past, I guess there were stories. Please check.
Which author? Alex?
Ha-ha)))You ask abit who the author?)))
I have previously published articles without source so how was new user for this ,cheetah earlier ban me!At the present time I publish only original content.Not to understand what you are accusing me of plagiarism?
I'm not going to anything to anyone to prove! One day I defended my position but I was again accused of plagiarism ...
My omission that I did not put a label on my photo @favorit before being published on the Internet.