You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: My initial thoughts on the current Judge Roy Moore controversy
I've always liked Roy Moore. Unfortunately, I've become more and more of a political athiest. I think the swamp is too thick and full to be drained. Even Ron Paul couldn't get anything done. Check out www.definingthemachine.com for why I'm not expecting any change from the people in Washington, D.C., no matter how well intentioned they are.
Hell. I consider myself an Anarcho-Capitalist. I'd like for there to be no government, and simply free market, and contracts. Yet that is not something I believe is realistic to implement at this time. So I am best described as a Libertarian.
Though really there are some things such as JUSTICE and DOUBLE STANDARD that can be addressed REGARDLESS of political affiliation.
Laws should not be okay for one party, and not the other.
Things done by one should not be okay, when they are wrong for the other.
Evidence is required. Opinion is not evidence.
These are things I can embrace regardless of the candidates.
I actually voted Libertarian or other Third Party in most cases in November of last year. When forced to pick between GOP or DEM I kind of did 50/50. I voted for some of both.
Now, I'd be hard pressed to vote for a DEM. It's not likely with how their party is acting, the hypocrisy, and the corruption of which the evidence is there. Furthermore, I'd likely not vote for an ESTABLISHED GOP. I'd be more interested in a GOP candidate that is not part of the establishment, and I'd seriously look for ACTIONS to make decisions about who to vote for instead of WORDS.
Though there are WORDS that will make me not vote for someone. Diversity is one such word. If ANY candidate mentions the word diversity I'll not vote for them. I believe in meritocracy not artificially enforced diversity.
Also I am a huge Ron Paul fan. Was a delegate for him in 2008 and 2012. :)