How to Spot Non-partisan Objective Trustworthy News Sources

in #news8 years ago

We are in a volatile time that polarizes and confuses global citizens. I changed by voter registration in 2016 to "no party." I don't know who to believe or trust anymore. It's just a crazy fucking mess.

Mainstream media lost credibility with me the day a British news correspondent reported from New York City on 911. She reported that authorities confirmed that WTC Building #7 collapsed while clearly, it was still standing in the panoramic background. I rationalized away thoughts of a manipulative shadow force puppeting media to control public thought. Over the years, I conquered my cognitive dissonance and came to accept the reality through the internet's growth and globally shared responsibility for monitoring and reporting on what's real vs. propaganda.

I am challenged with sorting out reliable and viable sources from those that are attention-seeking or purposefully placed by the powers that should not be for disseminating disinformation. I just want the truth dammit!

My signs for questionable sources are:

  • Over-the-top sensationalism
  • Dramatic fearmongering
  • Speculation without solid source and evidence
  • Aggressive sentiment
  • Fanaticism - too left, too right, too anything... I do not trust.
  • Closed to objective and fair criticism or debate
  • Diverting from the facts and skirting around answering legitimately good questions

My sort-of signs for trustworthy sources (I say sort-of because I can never ever really know):

  • Willingness to explore all angles
  • Ability to respectfully disagree
  • A commitment to fact checking and verification
  • A genuine attitude conveying a desire to inform and not intimidate
  • The willingness to accept open discussion for sake of understanding different perspectives
  • Collaboration with other sources and the public to complete the picture (instead of assume the picture)

All said, I open the discussion for other Steemians to share their criteria on trustworthy news sources. I ask for participation for the benefit of the collective common good of this community. Thank you and I appreciate your input.

Sort:  

As an accountant I try my best to practice "professional skeptisicm" and these are my basic rules regarding "news".

  1. Needs to be proven - I try to do my own homework. If a story doesn't cite a source it immediately goes into the suspect category.
  2. Read the abstract - "Study shows silly putty linked to VD" you don't need to read the study just look at the abstract and you can gather really valuable data about sample size, population...many articles cite scientific studies and pull statistics out of context to fit their narrative.
  3. Use Social Media - If the story came from your friend that wears their Make America Great Again hat every day the story is probably truthy at best. Same goes for your friend with the Prius with the Bernie Sticker with a I'm with HER sticker over the top of that.
  4. Don't be part of the problem - If you don't know if it is true don't spread it

I have been distracted, but greatly appreciate these basic rules. I do not want to be part of the problem, which is why I wrote in 1st place. Thank you thank you for sharing your wisdom and offering useful tips! I appreciate you!

1: Is it from MSM, controlled opposition or partisan group?
2: Does the story follow logic?
3: Does it have an agenda they are pushing?
4: Compare to counter stories. Fact check. Check history and parties related.
5: Make an informed judgement on reason and not on others opinions.
6: ???
7: Profit

Thank you as well for your input, I've been distracted with trying to get my own business up and running. I definitely compare stories, open myself to multiple sources, but in the era of fake news and alternative facts .... I am guarded with nearly every source of information. Glad to see that I have good company :-) Thanks for taking the time to offer guidance.