You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Disqusting Commercial From Norwegian Bank DNB, Using Children For Their Feminist Propaganda Lies
women chose to work in the public sector where the salaries are lower, but job security is high
Men and women are indeed different, it is completely natural for men to take more risks in search for higher rewards, while women would seek safety - that's hard-coded in our biology, and makes perfect sense.
Yup, of course. Men are always on the outlier compared to women who clutter in the middle when it comes to almost all traits (IQ, risk taking, mental disorders, creativity, etc) More stupid men than women, but also more clever men. Women are mostly in the middle. This is like you say hard coded, because women have to use social/mental traits to manipulate their surroundings (men) Since (almost) no women can compete with a men physically, she must be able to compete mentally.
Correct, but I don't buy your explaination - I think it's entirely down to evolution and statistics.
Oversimplified, and pulling some numbers out of a magic hat:
A "normal" woman will get 2 successful children, the "alpha"-woman will get 4 successful children, the unsuccessful woman gets 0 successful children.
The "normal" man gets 1 successful child, the "alpha"-man will have 100 successful children (politically incorrect, yes I know - but consider a grander time scale as well as cultural scale).
Consider two strategies, the "normal" strategy and the "eccentric" strategy. A strategy is chosen as soon as the sperm fuses with the egg.
With the "eccentric" strategy, there is a 10% probability to become an "alpha", and a 90% probability to become unsuccesful (early death, declared insane, spending the prime of adulthood in prison, etc).
Churning the numbers above, by average the "eccentric" man will get 10 successful children, while the "normal" man by average will have only one child. The "eccentric" woman will by average have 0.4 children while the "normal" woman by average will have 2 children.
In this scenario, eccentricity pays of for men, but not for women.
Of course, it's extremely rare in our current-day monogamous society that some man gets one hundred children - but our evolution has gone on for millions of years, and as far as I know, there exist mammal species where the alpha male becomes the father of the majority of the children in the flock.
Yes, men and women are psychologically different. But not according to academics in Scandinavia. In the sciences of gender and social constructionism at the universities in Norway and Sweden, the leading theory is that men and women are born the same, but develop the differences as a result of social programming. These theories are mostly ridiculed in the rest of the world and especially among biologists.
This is part of the explanation for the gender madness happening in Scandinavia.
seriously?
Unfortunately yes. It is the old nature or nurture debate. Sociology has always overemphasized the role of nurture and downplayed the role of nature, but in Scandinavia, the role of nature is totally erased and we are only left with the social construct. This documentary (youtube video in Norwegian with english subtitles) is a classic and explains the situation:
Unfortunately yes. It is the old nature or nurture debate. Sociology has always overemphasized the role of nurture and downplayed the role of nature, but in Scandinavia, the role of nature is totally erased and we are only left with the social construct. This documentary (youtube video in Norwegian with english subtitles) is a classic and explains the situation: