Does Adam have a belly button? I believe we can say, "No - Adam has no navel or Eve."
Why? Because your navel is a sign that you've connected with your mother. You depend on the 'lifeline' - the umbilical cord - to get your nutrients from your mother's body as you grow in them.
Girl with belly button showing. Courtesy of Films for Christ's copyrighted photo.
But our first parents, Adam and Eve, did not grow that way. I believe that God will not make a 'wrong sign' on their body as if they had ever grown in a mother's womb.
When God created Adam and Eve in the form of adults, on the day they were created, they may already look like, say, a 30-year-old man. But God does not want or feel the need to create a form that does not depict real history, because a tree created by God in the form of an adult need not have a cambium circle in their suitcase. The things that grow in their descendants are the result of further developments.
What's more, it will be an amazing proof of God's creativity. Ken Ham once explained it this way: The absence of a belly button on Adam and Eve will be one of the greatest attractions of the time before the Flood, as their grandchild and great-grandchildren will come and ask, "Why do grandparents not And Grandma has a belly button?" And they will remember , From generation to generation, about how God created it specifically in a miraculous way, and also designed it to reproduce and fill the earth in a natural way as part of the will of God. Continuous maintenance for what He has created.
I would love to see the scriptural evidence for any of the above... it looks like pure supposition and extrapolation to me... I could just as easily suppose the opposite and who would be correct? the facts are that there is insufficient detail and its not up to us to invent details.
"The LORD God made man out of the dust of the earth ... And the LORD God made man sleep well, and as he slept, the LORD God took one of the ribs from the place, and covered the place with flesh And from the rib of the LORD God From the man, he built a woman, and brought him to the man. "
-Events 2: 7,21-22
This could be allegorical too... as scripture often is, symbolizing the closeness, oneness, unity and partnership that should exist between husband and wife.
The forming/making from the dust of the earth could have been an evolutionary process and when the receptacle(sufficiently advanced body) and its environment were prepared, spirits were introduced. There are significant changes at various intervals in the archaeological record. The spirit or breath of life however does not leave a fossil...
If you want to find an answer based on the rationalization you can receive and if there is any source or reference specifically addressing the issue. I try to search on the internet maybe a lot of writing that can answer that problem. It turns out that there is not much writing to discuss the matter and the answer can not be satisfactory. Until now I still have not found the answer to the question "Does Prophet Adam have a Naval?" Which is satisfactory. If only someone had helped me answer that question of course I would be grateful for the addition of new knowledge that I have not understood
maybe there is
Does Adam have a belly button? I believe we can say, "No - Adam has no navel or Eve."
Why? Because your navel is a sign that you've connected with your mother. You depend on the 'lifeline' - the umbilical cord - to get your nutrients from your mother's body as you grow in them.
Girl with belly button showing. Courtesy of Films for Christ's copyrighted photo.
But our first parents, Adam and Eve, did not grow that way. I believe that God will not make a 'wrong sign' on their body as if they had ever grown in a mother's womb.
When God created Adam and Eve in the form of adults, on the day they were created, they may already look like, say, a 30-year-old man. But God does not want or feel the need to create a form that does not depict real history, because a tree created by God in the form of an adult need not have a cambium circle in their suitcase. The things that grow in their descendants are the result of further developments.
What's more, it will be an amazing proof of God's creativity. Ken Ham once explained it this way: The absence of a belly button on Adam and Eve will be one of the greatest attractions of the time before the Flood, as their grandchild and great-grandchildren will come and ask, "Why do grandparents not And Grandma has a belly button?" And they will remember , From generation to generation, about how God created it specifically in a miraculous way, and also designed it to reproduce and fill the earth in a natural way as part of the will of God. Continuous maintenance for what He has created.
I would love to see the scriptural evidence for any of the above... it looks like pure supposition and extrapolation to me... I could just as easily suppose the opposite and who would be correct? the facts are that there is insufficient detail and its not up to us to invent details.
"The LORD God made man out of the dust of the earth ... And the LORD God made man sleep well, and as he slept, the LORD God took one of the ribs from the place, and covered the place with flesh And from the rib of the LORD God From the man, he built a woman, and brought him to the man. "
-Events 2: 7,21-22
This could be allegorical too... as scripture often is, symbolizing the closeness, oneness, unity and partnership that should exist between husband and wife.
yes
Precisely, Genesis is about WHY the creation took place but is short on specific details of exactly how and exactly what.
The rocks and fossils of the Earth record that detail and it is ours to discover through scientific processes.
Scientifically that is our discovery. Whether you do not believe in what the Qur'an speaks of. That the first man on earth is adam
The first with the breath of life... perhaps others functioned on a different level? there can be multiple firsts when things progress and change.
How do you mean
The forming/making from the dust of the earth could have been an evolutionary process and when the receptacle(sufficiently advanced body) and its environment were prepared, spirits were introduced. There are significant changes at various intervals in the archaeological record. The spirit or breath of life however does not leave a fossil...
If you want to find an answer based on the rationalization you can receive and if there is any source or reference specifically addressing the issue. I try to search on the internet maybe a lot of writing that can answer that problem. It turns out that there is not much writing to discuss the matter and the answer can not be satisfactory. Until now I still have not found the answer to the question "Does Prophet Adam have a Naval?" Which is satisfactory. If only someone had helped me answer that question of course I would be grateful for the addition of new knowledge that I have not understood