You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steem blockchain multivote security vulnerability

in #palnet6 years ago

What if we tie the Witness Votepower to some rules like:

  1. The younger an account, the less influence.
  2. The more SP a account powered up, the longer it takes for his Witness-Votepower to rise.
  3. The less reputation an account has, the lesser his influence.
  4. An account cant have more influence than (lets say) 5% of the Community no matter how much SP he owns.

I already tried to get this mechanic into a formula and when i have more time, i try to explain better how and why i think this is good.

Im not that good with maths. Its just about the idea and i would be happy if some people read this and think about how we could make the formula better or what problems this could cause. Thank you!

https://steempeak.com/steem/@remotehorst23/steem-blockchain-has-a-major-problem-and-maybe-the-solution-is-pretty-easy

Sort:  

ad.1 - Yes. 1 would be best, 3 would be quite good. But I'm afraid both are impossible.

ad.2 - good idea!

ad3. - reputation could be manipulated, could bring more problems.

ad4. - not possible without KYC, as STEEM owner can always split his stake between many accounts as needed.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.07
TRX 0.29
JST 0.047
BTC 66826.63
ETH 1989.70
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.51