I also don't think an artist doesn't need to explain themselves for their art. I only do process shots for the sake of dispelling doubt to any reader it's a plagiarized imaged. We have seen the platform post several plagiarized post and authors claiming to be who they are not.
Steemit.com is not suitable for blogging the kind of content you provide as an artist. Your work would be suited in a gallery type of platform that still interacts with the blockchain. Elegance and Artisteem are those platforms that are made suited for artists. But steemit.com isn't. It's like a default site to host written content and less of audiovisual arts.
That is your opinion and it's good for you.
Where are those implicit "laws"? I have never read that steemit is only for written content.
No laws for them. I'm just saying this frontend has not adapted to specific niche content for specific content creators. I mean, audiovisual artists have to post through dtube, vimmtv or youtube and embed their content here on a separate post to be visible as an example. They need a 3rd party DApp. Steemit more oriented to word blogs or micro-blogging.
I don't agree with anything you say.