You do realise that you just did exactly what those you were just condemning do right?
A piece of information comes across that you did not agree with, and rather than inviting critical debate or conversation, you dismissed the comment because it does not adhere to your current paradigm. This is the cognitive dissonance that you speak of, demonstrated by none other than yourself.
I have neither the time, patience, or interest, no matter what my opinion is. I have too many projects I have to complete, and this is a time waster. Not even sure why I said anything to begin with, frankly.
I'd also like to point out that I actually like you as a Steemit user, and I'd rather not jeopardize that with some stupid conversation about topics that we happen to disagree on, and which neither of us are even directly involved in.
Well that's not too dissimilar from what I said.
But, I think anyone that still believes in the moon landing after seeing the evidence that demonstrates the plethora of inconsistencies with the official story, is mentally impaired.
Even NASA admitted not too long ago that they have never been beyond low Earth orbit because of the radiation belt, debunking their own moon-landing claims.
I have neither the time, patience, or interest, no matter what my opinion is. I have too many projects I have to complete, and this is a time waster. Not even sure why I said anything to begin with, frankly.
An opportunity to learn should never be regarded as a waste of time. Whether it is learning new information that helps you make better sense of the world, or a new perspective that helps you understand humanity a little better, there are always lessons to be learned through conversation.
I'll let you get back to your projects. If you ever feel like continuing the conversation, I'm not difficult to find on here. Good day-
I'd also like to point out that I actually like you as a Steemit user, and I'd rather not jeopardize that with some stupid conversation about topics that we happen to disagree on, and which neither of us are even directly involved in.
Please do not worry in this regard. Nothing is in jeopardy from my perspective. I invite conversation with those whom I have a conflicting opinion with, because I am always open to having my mind changed given new information being presented.
I have had some very long, very interesting conversation with people on here that held a dichotomous point of view to mine, and in the process I believe we established somewhat of a friendship.
As I say, I am open to converse at a time when you are not so busy. I should be writing myself now, but become too distracted by comments and by content.
You're right in your implication that there will be those who will dismiss even irrefutable evidence as fallacious if it contradicts with what they want to believe, but there is still more of those, I believe, that are willing to accept facts when presented correctly.
I was actually referring to having something that could constitute proof, only for those who want pizzagate to be true to somehow debunk the truth to perpetuate the conspiracy. It happens with all conspiracies, or people wouldn't still be arguing about the moon landings.
The first problem that you're gonna run into is that many, including me, consider much of the so called evidence for the other side of the argument to be false and even in of itself evidence that pizzagate is false.
Where as some would consider the misinformation you speak of, an attempt by the guilty parties to discredit the investigation. It's going to be a very difficult one to put to bed, for sure.
The pizza place is a building right? I mean if someone where to have full access to that building or place it under extreme surveillance or something along those lines. Literally swab the whole thing down for any fingerprints or evidence. If not so much as even one thing pops up. That would be enough to debunk it.
This is like asking atheists to prove God doesn't exist.
That's not how burden of proof works.
I disagree. If pizzagate is a hoax then there will be evidence out there that speaks to that.
Not in a world of cognitive dissonance.
You do realise that you just did exactly what those you were just condemning do right?
A piece of information comes across that you did not agree with, and rather than inviting critical debate or conversation, you dismissed the comment because it does not adhere to your current paradigm. This is the cognitive dissonance that you speak of, demonstrated by none other than yourself.
I have neither the time, patience, or interest, no matter what my opinion is. I have too many projects I have to complete, and this is a time waster. Not even sure why I said anything to begin with, frankly.
I'd also like to point out that I actually like you as a Steemit user, and I'd rather not jeopardize that with some stupid conversation about topics that we happen to disagree on, and which neither of us are even directly involved in.
[Nested Reply]
Well that's not too dissimilar from what I said.
But, I think anyone that still believes in the moon landing after seeing the evidence that demonstrates the plethora of inconsistencies with the official story, is mentally impaired.
Even NASA admitted not too long ago that they have never been beyond low Earth orbit because of the radiation belt, debunking their own moon-landing claims.
Aaaand we're done here.
An opportunity to learn should never be regarded as a waste of time. Whether it is learning new information that helps you make better sense of the world, or a new perspective that helps you understand humanity a little better, there are always lessons to be learned through conversation.
I'll let you get back to your projects. If you ever feel like continuing the conversation, I'm not difficult to find on here. Good day-
Please do not worry in this regard. Nothing is in jeopardy from my perspective. I invite conversation with those whom I have a conflicting opinion with, because I am always open to having my mind changed given new information being presented.
I have had some very long, very interesting conversation with people on here that held a dichotomous point of view to mine, and in the process I believe we established somewhat of a friendship.
As I say, I am open to converse at a time when you are not so busy. I should be writing myself now, but become too distracted by comments and by content.
You're right in your implication that there will be those who will dismiss even irrefutable evidence as fallacious if it contradicts with what they want to believe, but there is still more of those, I believe, that are willing to accept facts when presented correctly.
I was actually referring to having something that could constitute proof, only for those who want pizzagate to be true to somehow debunk the truth to perpetuate the conspiracy. It happens with all conspiracies, or people wouldn't still be arguing about the moon landings.
The first problem that you're gonna run into is that many, including me, consider much of the so called evidence for the other side of the argument to be false and even in of itself evidence that pizzagate is false.
Where as some would consider the misinformation you speak of, an attempt by the guilty parties to discredit the investigation. It's going to be a very difficult one to put to bed, for sure.
True, although that's likey to be a whole lot easier than debunking most rumours being spread on any one issue....
The pizza place is a building right? I mean if someone where to have full access to that building or place it under extreme surveillance or something along those lines. Literally swab the whole thing down for any fingerprints or evidence. If not so much as even one thing pops up. That would be enough to debunk it.