Brzezinski's Ruse: American Empire is Dead, China and Russia Take Over
Zbigniew Brzezinski has written an article in The American Interest titled “Towards a Global Realignment” that has received a tremendous amount of attention on the internet, along with much gloating.
Brzezinski is an architect of the world’s current military and economic disasters and as such he has plenty of enemies. With this article, they see him recanting his previous arrogance and vision of a worldwide US hegemony.
In fact, in the alternative media, many champion his apparent admission as a huge win for the world and a huge defeat for imperialism.
But it's not. It is the exact opposite, as I’ll explain below.
Certainly, anyone who cares about humanity and freedom would love to see the American Empire die. It has been responsible for uncountable atrocities. And like many, I was surprised at first to learn that one of the world's most evil men was “giving up.”
But I've learned to never take devils like this at their word.
Really? Now, Brzezinski just says he is giving up? After a lifetime of building the American empire to the current monstrosity that it is?
He's not giving up.
All he is doing – all they are doing (the ones who work with him) - is moving on to the next level of tyrannical, murderous empire. The next level will be a global empire. A one world government empire.
Brzezinski’s statement is just part of a larger strategy of thesis/antithesis/synthesis. In this case, Brzezinski used to provide the thesis as a co-founder of the elite, globalist Trilateral commission with David Rockefeller, but now he is providing the antithesis.
Here, from his article:
“As its era of global dominance ends, the United States needs to take the lead in realigning the global power architecture.Five basic verities regarding the emerging redistribution of global political power and the violent political awakening in the Middle East are signaling the coming of a new global realignment.
The first of these verities is that the United States is still the world’s politically, economically, and militarily most powerful entity but, given complex geopolitical shifts in regional balances, it is no longer the globally imperial power.”
This excerpt and others like it in the article have provided celebrations throughout the web. Some of the rejoicing involves an element of sophistication. These analyses begin to understand that a so-called climb-down is not a “defeat.”
But others shout about it from the rooftops: "Look the Americans are going to stop killing everybody! It's over!"
Russia and China feature strongly in this gloating – in both sophisticated and unsophisticated analyses. Brzezinski’s motive for his “climb-down” is supposedly the threats that these two countries represent to US interests.
Again, it is difficult to understand how any serious writer with access to the internet can take this interpretation of Russian and Chinese “threats” seriously.
Take note of Putin. Is he really the hero who is going to stop the US Empire? Putin’s father was supposedly Stalin’s chauffer and Putin came to power under the watchful eye of US and Western bankers who were at the time working hard to establish an “independent” Russian central bank.
Putin was, as well, an assistant to then-president Boris Yeltsin and served in various federal capacities in Moscow from 1996 to 1999.
Putin came to Moscow as a Deputy Chief of the Presidential Property Management Department. By August 1999 he had become one of three First Deputy Prime Ministers.
This is an extraordinary rise to power, one so quick that it is tempting to say his rise was preordained. In other words, the three-year federal career he enjoyed was a kind of formality designed to justify what had already been decided on, that he would be the next leader of Russia. Quite similar to Obama's sudden rise to power from a "community organizer", whatever that is, to President of the US.
It’s important to emphasize that Putin’s rise must have been engineered by Russia’s Western/US supervisors. Nothing that took place in Russia at that time could have occurred another way. Putin must have had CIA and City blessing.
When it comes to the Chinese, the same sorts of assumptions can be made. There is a good chance, for instance, that China’s communist founder Mao was actually a member of Skull and Bones.
Mao may have achieved this status by attending a Chinese branch of the Yale Divinity School. Though the US supposedly supported the “nationalists” when Mao was struggling to take power, a good argument can be made that, as before, Wall Street had already determined that communism would win.
This is certainly what happened in Russia during the communist “revolution.” Jacob Schiff. Head of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., personally financed Trotsky's trip from New York to Russia.
Later on, as G. Edward Griffin shows in his great book, the Creature from Jeykll Island, Wall Street tycoons infiltrated Russia dressed as Red Cross workers and provided necessary funds to the Revolution in order to ensure its victory.
The same thing happened before World War II, when Hitler’s rise to power was financed by American, British and Swiss industrialists and bankers including the Bush crime family.
So close were the ties between Western corporations and Germany that it was not until the middle of the war that the Bush family was finally stripped of its German investments and forced to pay a significant fine.
We have hundreds of years of evidence showing the world’s banking elites always are involved on both sides of major political, military and economic matters.
Why on earth would anyone presenting a serious analysis of what’s going on today conclude that Brzezinski is actually worried about either China or Russia.
He probably knows the leaders personally. Or better yet, he knows the heads of China’s wealthiest families, the ones that really run the country behind China’s façade of communism.
China and Russia are part of the so-called BRICS, an entity named by a banker at Goldman Sachs. The SDR currency basket in which China is placing its yuan currency at the beginning of October is run by the Washington-controlled International Monetary Fund.
We are supposed to believe that China intends to undermine the US economically. But if so, then the Western-based IMF is playing a major part in this undermining.
As well, we are supposed to believe that Russia and China – huge countries that Western elites have always secretly supported and cultivated – intend to dispose of the dollar as soon as they can.
It's true to an extent. The plan to destroy the US and the dollar to bring in a one world government is true... but it isn't because of anything China and Russia, in particular, are doing.
With his boss David Rockefeller, Brzezinksi formulated the geopolitical structure we live in today. They never had any intention of creating an environment where the US lorded over every nook and cranny of the larger world.
The idea was to bring Russia and China along gradually until they were ready to shoulder a power sharing arrangement. Sound a lot like Orwell’s 1984? Well that’s no coincidence is it? Orwell ran in the same circles as the globalists. This plan has been in the works for a good long while.
What we’re looking at today is the shift from a mostly AngloAmerican tyranny to a one world, global government tyranny.
Brzezinksi may sound like he’s giving up on “American empire” but in fact, he’s merely acknowledging the larger plan.
He makes it sound like an apology and plenty of his chroniclers are falling for it. He’s an old man, and he must just love the attention! This is his “last laugh.” How he must be chuckling at the coverage.
I should note as well that his apology is right on time – at the end of this Jubilee Year. He waited almost as long as he could to trigger his so-called confession.
Look closely and you can see he’s not apologizing at all but declaring victory. He and David Rockefeller have accomplished exactly what they set out to do. They’ve created a phony tripartite world. What many don't understand, though, is that London’s City is still in charge of it.
Everything meshes with a larger, globalist strategy including the timing. As noted, they’re bringing the Chinese yuan into the IMF's SDR basket the day before the end of the Jubilee. The US empire is dying as intended - and right on time. A global one is on the rise.
Did you think Brzezinski would just give up after he marched the ball all the way down the field to the one yard line? No, his article was a metaphorical spiking of the ball. And just as intended, most are interpreting his spike as a fumble. It's amazing how people fall for it time and time again.
Ironically, Brzezinksi has spent his professional life practicing various kinds of subterfuge. In this his last and greatest achievement, he gets to position himself as a contrite individual who lost his way.
Because most don't understand what is really going on, they’ll come to the wrong conclusions. They’ll either gloat or perhaps some of them may feel a tiny bit of compassion for the man – who seemingly wasted his life and now admits it.
They’ll have to listen very hard for the ghostly chuckling, but believe me it’s there. I can hear it…
And let me be clear on another point: This bastard will be chuckling from the grave. The game he is playing is a serious one. All you have to do is check the Georgia Guidestones to understand that.
Don`t know what they are? Then take a look and read the first of the ten commandments inscribed on this miniature Stonehenge. Here it is:
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. Still inclined to feel sorry for Brzezinski? He's not just a global manipulator, he's part of a bunch that his in mind wiping out seven billion people sooner or later.
Of course, the good news is that you're reading this article and therefore must stop by Steemit to take a look at our blog regularly or irregularly. I'd invite you to come by often (and follow us at @dollarvigilante) for as students of Shemitah Trends and this now-finalizing Jubilee Year, we understand elite plans and timelines like almost no other publication.
Our readers, especially those thousands who subscribe to our newsletter have benefited from our research and investment results. In fact, our Senior Analyst Ed Bugos has managed to triple our TDV portfolio in the last year.
We're not fooled by people like Brzezinksi and their false statements of humility. We understand the game here at TDV, from beginning to end. And where we're not quite sure of the direction, we wait a while until we find the inevitable clue.
They always talk too much and we're very good at listening.
Wow.
I hate to be that guy but:
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
So, got any sources?
Please don't tell me "do your own research" as it just comes across as "I don't have any sources, please find them for me."
Which claims exactly? Try reading the last 6 years of what we've written, daily. If you are/were unaware of our work this would be very hard to understand. This is the result of decades of research and analysis.
That's not a source.
Whichever claim you think is the easiest to prove.
Which globalists did Orwell run around with? Correspondence, photos?
Why do you think the "Guide Stones" are anything more than an art piece?
If you've written about it daily for 6 years, with decades of research, providing a source to back up what you say should be trivial.
Agenda 21 comes up a lot... It will not be hard to find an abundance of videos and material.
ok
Agenda 21 is a non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development.[1] It is a product of the Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment and Development) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels. The "21" in Agenda 21 refers to the 21st Century. It has been affirmed and had a few modifications at subsequent UN conferences.
Sounds terrible. :P
I'm sorry but I call bullshit. There is no evidence of America trying to gain global power, period. Not one American person is trying to gain global power. Is America trying to be leader in global security and peace? At one time yes, now not so much. Todays running mates are looking for national notoriety, it's proven time and time again, whether it's trump and Mexico, Hillary and women's rights in the Mideast, or even apple and the tax they just got nailed with. America is way behind in being global leaders in anything let alone global power, America is so far lapses in today's times that Rush Limbaugh could probably win an election right now. Don't get me wrong, I think the US is all effed up, but we can't get global power when our own citizens are ready to overthrow the government. And if we find factual evedinexe cr of anybody tryin to be a global superpower from the US, I'm willing to bet the history of our people that it will never happen. Don't forget about the people, they will rise up.
I would recommend reading the "Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein. While written from the point of view of the left, it is very thorough in the research and interviews that were done to write it. It was an eye opener for me. It definitely contains many answers to the second sentence in your post, with names and dates, and interviews with world leaders.
https://www.amazon.com/Shock-Doctrine-Rise-Disaster-Capitalism/dp/0312427999/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1472835962&sr=8-1&keywords=shock+doctrine
EDIT: I should add that the book is equally critical of communism, socialism, capitalism, etc., It points out common threads throughout the world that impact all of us, regardless of what type of government it is. I believe Brzezinski was one of the "gatekeepers" that was interviewed in the book.
Perhaps you are not aware of the extensive reach of the U.S. military, comparatively speaking. The United State has more military "outposts" in foreign countries around the world than all other countries combined. This was done for one purpose, and one purpose only, and that was to be in a position to respond globally and secure any region of the world in the shortest amount of time. WWII taught us what a logistical nightmare it is to transport the necessary number of troops and equipment all from the homeland. It became apparent and obvious that we needed "outposts," if for not other reason than to serve as staging areas for military engagements. We remain a global super power primarily because we have more military equipment than any of the other players, including Russia and China. China has us in number of people, but they lack the logistical capability to launch an overseas military campaign; their navy has 1 old aircraft carrier that they are still learning to operate and another that they are still trying to build. Russia also lacks the naval capabilities to compete, but they are much more respectable from a military standpoint and would give any country a run for their money. It may not seem like we are a global super power at the moment, but that's because we have an 8 year experiment in destroying America coming to an end. All we can hope for is that the Electoral College doesn't vote Hillary in to follow.
I'm confused. In your previous article no later that yesterday, Putin is a fierce opponent to the US hegemony ready to go as far a nuclear war to defend his turf.
Has school damaged my mind to the point where I see contradictions where there are none?
So how does one man confront such a well planned, long executed, and astronomically financed effort? All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing, but what should a good man do?
@hunterisgreat just like in game of thrones, you play the game. We need to use the tools that we have available. Right now our strongest weapons are technology and information. We need to connect and inform people about things that are going on in our world on a daily basis.
Join thegame https://steemit.com/steemit/@echoesinthemind/the-game-of-war-syrian-war-report-september-1-2015
now the question is
How can you improve the game? the future is in our hands and we can shape it.
This is a good question!!! Im asking myself the same since i start to read about all this some years ago... still looking for the answer :(
.@hunterisgreat For starters, Read a fucking book
It was a rhetorical question, but what book would you suggest I read?
Well, I'd start with a book called Postwar, a history of Europe Since 1945. https://www.amazon.com/Postwar-History-Europe-Since-1945/dp/0143037757 The entire narrative of this post is filled with such out their implications and assumtions that I can't even begin to correct the record on it. The United States does plenty of underhanded stuff, its just that all the things the author of this post accuses it of are things it didn't do. .
Jeff, let me to say Thank You! for sharing your vision. In Russia there is movement called "Public Safety Сoncept". Your words are very close to main ideas of that movement.
I don't agree with all your writings, but it's certainly true that a lot of people inside the "elits" are looking for a worldwide gouvernment, where of course they would be the head-office or the thinking power. Will they succeed after USA collapsed is another story. It depends on people like you and me, but also on internal conflicts of this class, for instance China and Russia will not necessarily play the game they are assigned to.
Because China, Russia and every other country that was made of out war cares? Or something will change? Sometimes I am seriously doubting the fate of this planet only from the sheer non-sense your followers buy without even thinking.
...and ofcourse we have to wrap our post with even more tinfoil for better digestion.
If I wrote a post about all the good things America has done, the value of that post would be $0.00.
Some people get off on conspiracy theories. It is what it is.
America, like every country in the world, safeguards its own interests. The difference between America and other countries is that we're powerful enough to get what we want most of the time.
Not anymore
There's a difference between the power we have and the power we use. When Obama took office his philosophy as regards military action was "don't do stupid shit," so he didn't want to intervene in Syria, doesn't want to use groundtroops to go after Isis, etc. Clearly he feels like we shouldn't throw our weight around in that way. We didn't want to go to war with Russia to save Crimea. You shouldn't mistake that for the United States being militarily weak. If there's one thing we can do well its use military force, or the threat of military force, or our economic power to get things we want.
You must be joking about the crimea, "save the crimea", russia realy save the crimea, i perfectly know what i am talking about. You should watch less goverment tv like bbc, cnn, bloomberg and others...the situation in the world is not you thinkin about, sorry for my english)
@laconicflow
someone always is. The post above i pointless. it only serves to reinforce the tinfoiled narrative of the author
you have an interesting article, thanks for sharing, look at my article about State Debt of the USA.
Government Deficits and Debt, Biases versus Reality. The State Debt of the USA!
https://steemit.com/economics/@kental/government-deficits-and-debt-biases-versus-reality
Guess-work
Orwell's 1984..kept postponing to read it,a one world global tyranny sounds painful.
It is going to be painful! Read it! It will send shivers down your spine and you will all of a sudden see exactly what is going on already.
Look it is a Brzezinski special!