Why Does Australia Have Children as Young as 10 in its Prison System?

in #politics5 years ago

The other day I came across a film, In My Blood it Runs. I haven't seen it, just the trailer, but the article it came with discussed the fact that the Australian justice system incarcerates children as young as 10 in its prison system. I was gobsmacked by the thought that this country criminalises children from such a young age, but didn't want to jump to conclusions as there could be more to this than meets the eye. After all, the media is known for sensationalising. Surely a child between the age of 10 and 14 would only end up imprisoned for the most extreme reasons, despite the law allowing it from this age. So I looked into it some more.

iStock-600094120-1350x900.jpg
Source

In the UK I vividly remember the case of 2 year old Jamie Bulger. His killers were just 10 years old at the time and, due to the serious nature of the crime, a special case was made to try them as adults. At the time I thought that this meant that 10 year olds couldn't normally be held as criminally responsible for their actions, but it seems that 10 is also the age of criminal responsibility there too. Normally they would have been tried as juveniles, however. Yet surely this would be the only real reason to lock a child that young up. Unfortunately not.

In 2016 it was calculated that more than 900 young Australians would be spending Christmas in jail. Of these:

”More than 5 per cent of this population are between 10 and 12 years old and 74 per cent of this age group are Indigenous. Most have been charged or convicted with petty crimes, like graffiti, vandalism, shop lifting or fare evasion.”

Admittedly, up to the age of 14 the prosecution does have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the child was morally aware that what they were doing was seriously wrong, as opposed to just being mischievous, which leaves me questioning how on earth they are ending up in the prison system for petty crimes. How many groups of children, older than 14 even, get up to mischief jumping on trains without any money and running off at the next stop when confronted by the conductors? Do we really think they see it as anything other than cheeky and relatively harmless?

Studies conclusively show that children well into their teens have immature brain development which affects their ability to make careful judgments, delay gratification, restrain impulsive behaviour, think through their actions and, yes, even to distinguish right from wrong. There is a reason that 21 used to be the gateway age to adulthood in many countries, before it was reduced to 18. The brain is still developing and making lots of new connections until that age. It's also a fact that the prefrontal cortex develops at different rates in different people and that is the part of the brain which deals with what we usually call common sense and forward planning. It's the part that might rein us in from doing something stupid because it foresees consequences to current actions.

” Ten year old kids belong in schools and playgrounds, not in prisons, but Australia’s archaic laws are ripping children from their families, community and culture and throwing them into concrete cells.”

The chances are that single offenses wouldn't get them incarcerated, but the majority of those in the prison system are from disadvantaged backgrounds, where they are unlikely to be getting the sort guidance needed to get them on a better path. They are finding that children who go into the criminal justice system are more likely to only get worse sooner as they miss out on education and feel like they're further being punished while in there. Locking them up at this age, rather than looking at programmes to rehabilitate or divert will only lead to a growing adult prison population in the future. This is no way for a child to start their life with this as their only prospect.

”Indigenous children make up 5 per cent of Australians aged between 10 and 17, but 50 per cent of children in jail or under community-based supervision on an average day.”

For a country which has only recently made apologies for the stolen generations it's disappointing to see that they are still failing with regards the indigenous population and indeed disadvantaged children in general. Prison should be an absolute last resort for anyone under the age of 18 and it shouldn't even be an option for anyone under 16.

~○♤○~

all liquid steem rewards from this post will go to @familyprotection.

Sort:  

this is shocking but also not surprising, governments all over the world prefer to just ignore the suffering and plight of those that are disadvantaged, easier to just put them away than help them xx

All about the quickest, easiest route, isn't it.

Programs and stuff (especially when United and unproven because no one is game enough to try) means less budget surplus (because that’s the most important election point ever) and jails and detention centres already exist? 😖

When we last did a tour of Fremantle Prison a hundred million years ago I’m pretty sure the guides said back in the day they had kids as young as 9 in there so if that’s accurate it’s gone up to 10 😵

Yet programs are proven, just in other countries. Increase the age of detention and that might save enough to move that money to support and diversion. If they actually thought about it, that would be a positive promise to put in an election campaign, but they probably couldn't see that, because these kids are nothing other than a nuisance to them, so why would they envision anyone else felt any different?

So if it's taken us a couple of hundred years to increase to a minimum age of 10, we might have another 100 to get to 11.

But it's not proven HERE and we're different?

I'm currently dizzy from the amount of eye rolling I've been doing, also you need to imagine me saying so much of this stuff with a really ditzy rising inflection XD

Actually it might be provable at least locally if someone wanted to crunch numbers (I know a few of the PCYCs run support/diversion type programs here) but yes what you said.

Eye rolling to be avoided if you want to avoid dizzy spells. 😆 Lesson learnt.

That's interesting that there are some support/diversion programs. I wonder what the locations are on them. Are they only run in the slightly better off areas or areas nearer to the city where there's an actual incentive to try and improve crime rates, while the country areas are just ignored? 🤔

We're in a generally lower socioeconomic area doing its utmost to gentrify, not sure what that qualifies as x_x

I'm sorry I missed this tag. I'll send you some point instead for using #auspolitics - tag me next time so I see it. xx

Congratulations @life-relearnt! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!

Despite children in general may not have a a mature brain to make logical / common decisions, but there are some really rare cases if things are not dealt with immediately, it could get worse.

I am not condoning children be trialed as adults and be jailed as adults, but I hope when there's jail time, there also have a psychological assessment on these offenders to see if there are some "odd sparks" of psychiatric misbehavior inside.

I speak of this because I found out someone I knew decades ago, had the tendency to hurt animals as young as 8 and threw a puppy into boiling hot oil (while someone is deep frying pastry) recently beat his own mother to death, and apparently was not remorseful and now no where found.

During his deep fried puppy "experiment" was in the 80s, and where I came from some of the people who live in rural and isolation were still less educated and live quite savagely, and there's no psychiatric profession to assist this.

I hope in this era, Australia will be much better dealing with young offenders with both science, medical and spiritual side.

Posted using Partiko Android