Block feature would be just another way to silence people who post and deserve true equality on posts earnings and monetary value. Tho some would use it well, to others it will be just another feature to mass abuse. When a "Big Guy" makes a post telling their HUGE following to block a user, is that fair? As new users come in they are being flagged and attacked already by existing features, causing them bad experiences and to leave the blockchain moments after entry. Again, making more features for "Virtual Elites" to abuse with mass followings will not be a solution. It will result only in the loss of more users, and existing users. When all small are cast aside with no voice because options were made that can be abused, there will be no "Crowd Funding" going on for any elites. They will remain going in the same circle with the same following. Followers losing interest over time, and leaving, too. Equality in my vision is where everyone is seen, and folks just have the choice to control themselves not others by making the choice to simply close the page and move along. In the end it would become just an every growing, unstoppable chain allowed to grow together in peace. No one man, can gain the votes of every man. Most know this as fact. So the more you make, the more you have to sweat waiting to see if it's 50/50 between the people. Chancing loss. Leave it alone maybe, and work on flags so the equality balances out for all instead of on controls out weighing side.