You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why You Should Admire, Not Detest, John D Rockefeller

Yep, that's the cover story all right. And they paid a lot for that propaganda.

But, because of rock-e-person we now poison people and then does them with radiation to "kill" cancer. Of course, the opposition that is curing cancer with herbs (like cannabis) are being killed unless the flee The US.

Because of rock-e-person, everyone goes to a govern-cement school where they are dumbed down and have their creativity destroyed.

And gasoline could cost ¼ of what it does now, but keeping the price up was more important than releasing those inventions that would have made it so, thanks to Rock-e-person's legacy.

Sort:  

I'd argue that the propaganda is what children learn about him in government schools - the widely-believed idea that he was an evil "Robber baron" who should be hated.

I think what his heirs did with his estate after he passed away is a legit criticism, but is it his fault that the fortune was used for evil purposes? I don't think so.

That's why I put the disclaimer at the end saying: This post was solely written so you can see John Davison Rockefeller in a different light. It is by no means a defense of what his heirs and benefactors have done with his fortune since he passed away.