You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Curating the Internet: Science and technology micro-summaries for September 3, 2019
Thanks! I think (hope) this style of posting is a good way to bring a lot of fresh content onto the blockchain in a repeatable and consistent way, without spamming or demanding too much cognitive effort from the reader.
I liked the Adidas one, too. It's a creative way to turn a problem into an opportunity.
I understand about the distilled post. I think that outage threw some kinks into a lot of people's plans. Growing pains.
I wish you will continue this series! I am always happy to learn 2-3 things outside my field (which I am sure I will here).
By the way, a new distilled has been posted earlier today (but not too much on it because of the hard fork issues) :)
Thanks for the feedback! Sometimes I wonder how many people are reading, so I really appreciate it.
Is it appropriate to use the #steemstem category for these? I only included it on this post because I incorporated steemstem content, but otherwise I've been avoiding the tag because I thought it was reserved for primary material. I'll certainly add it to future science & technology posts if this series fits there.
I am pretty sure that answering "not many" would be quite correct... Unfortunately, I think that most STEM authors are in this situation. However, how to better attract content producers otherwise than by providing good content to read?
This being said, I have read your post. So at least the number of reader is greater than 0 ;)
The content discusses STEM. So yes: feel free to use the #steemstem tag (I would even encourage you to do so).
Sorry for the delay. I missed this reply earlier. As-of tomorrow, I'll start using #steemstem as a tag on these posts then. I also added the @steemstem account as a beneficiary in my template a couple days ago in order to support STEM curation. Thanks for the feedback!