how to incentive the a-credit-ed russian academic class out of uno/bolshevism mania?

in #russia2 months ago

currently incentives are oriented toward "uno over all things".

and how to put their great minds /nosarc toward Russia future as one nation.

and not an hollowed out servile docile domesticated defenseless obedient proxy (or part - worst) of the uno global governance employees dominion or estate - as uno propriety.

behind sovereignty there is propriety.

"whom decides, in a sense belongs".

a little dignity and realism against wishful thinking induced by agentless neurogenesis

(together as one... see how the enemies operates, always, the gorkas tools kit)

answer : no

as P in PLA stand for PEOPLE and it's PLAoC of CHINA. like PRC... ahhh (or PoCLA works too People of China Liberation Army - sound nice :).

not as one (uno sense).

not possible

do your own stuffs : YOUR SIDES; OUR SIDE.

ps if you wait for the arrivals of the nazguls to change your mind back to sanity, remember they take what they want, and i mean lives, so too late, it is. Why stand against what can't be stopped? you crossed the line. then. not deterrence, maybe they won't come :). but if they do, there is nothing to save you from your own lies. deceiving yourselves may make feel you as you wish, it won't matter.

and for the little shysters of the kremlin, the L in PLA stand against WHAT, from WHAT, off WHAT? ahh... ahhh there was nothing after yalta in your educational books? the past was gone and there is no future outside of the boundaries of the uno accredited understanding. waoo.

understand little shit in your mini world, what it means this L? how ridicule, your plans and "grand" strategy aspiration of your bookrooms are? your eurocentrered minds are still locked to understand what happened "there" in the sense not of the happened as events rows but as outcome, the happening, the constant flow forward.

So that and you will have to accept that all those who will look toward US in any hostile way will be seen as backward as they are and will be in the domains that interests above all the integrity of china as one nation. prime objectives: as simple as two words in english : DEFEND CHINA.

see the simplicity behind and how all strides against this will sooner or later be only "punches in jelly", but there they are. Woo bad idea, to try to punch the wind of a nazgul. "you did".

and it's how the "humanist" eurocentred approach as all "humans" as biological papers of the bolshevicks to write over, as golem, or goyim, is impossible for some to consider as possible.

simply.

borders.

the problem in the intransigance of the liberation drive, all attempts ending as exposed reveal a wish to harm CHINA as understood as it's OWN DEFENSE POSTURE aka the limits of itself.

where it begins or where the area of the liberation ends.

the moment in the flow of where this is not china.

just behind it, it is.

LIBERATED.

and what the accredited bookroom reader doesn't understand the energy deployed, the sacrifices made to achieve this liberation, and i mean in the sense too of CHEER POWER DEPLOYED.

YES POWER. not weakness, not pity. not mercy nor asking for forgivness or worst guilt.

none.

JUST POWER DEPLOYED to achieve LIBERATION.

of?

the PEOPLE OF CHINA.

inscription of dignity in the mandate the whole, cleared.

and the order facing you, as cleaness, remember not weakness as is the opening door.

the contrary o fweakness, an absolute certitude in the POWER to be.

and so the welcoming again isn't weakness or defenlessness to exploit in any way.

maybe that they understand (what they yankeesatanists don't).

it's the POWER they refuse, too much for them.

as it's an absolutism.

and in whole logic an assault by any ways against it is not a good idea as it's an act of war against PRC and as such the whole nation of china.

the difficulty to bring them, those kremlinists idiots, back to understanding the LIBERATION FORCES.

imho the only way forward : co existential, in respect, harmony etc.

recognizing the existence of the other as STATE or RES PUBLIC ORGANIZATION and as individuals.

what the bolshevicks refuse as their "organization" will adapt the individuals to it

and not the reverse way : CHINESES LIBERATED CHINA.

understand the logical outcome behind? simple : them who decides over china.

and not some fucking little bookroom maniac-ing about taking over all govs to merge them under one org. no way.

as china was liberated in FORCES or POWER POWER POWER so beyond your understanding, your attempts to divert this accomplishment are a nefarious expression of your own culture, lack of understanding and ability to comprehend reality.

i know why you hate this representation of a past china dear daddy yankees :

POWER.

power that you don't control.

simply.

so you attempted.

this system, a long time a revolution of it, rejuvenation was wished.

and finally with the LIBERATION : it's reality in work in progress :)

again,

i have maybe an image such vip of the kremlin traveling caravan will understand

the liberation of china is but in it's was in the earlies like a giant tidal wave (tsunami) over CHINA, rinsing it, with a POWER you can't comprehend, power as forces in motion and above power to overcome them all as beyond your realm. really. and now you see a calm pound. don't forget how this peacefull water arrived there and stays.

the great illusion many foreigners fall in. "it looks so peacefull, so easy (to conquer and all)".

(

)

and why they hate her :

as she illustrate the POWER they can't control as they can't stop her.

oh noe.

buzy nazgools on the tea house tables, don't have the same clouts as when saying "ours" pointing all there is beyond. they are buzy, their "majoong game", very serious. but no would dare to interupt nazgul playing their games listening to some music but the excuse of one doing and leaving.

and what's amusing in a sense , no amount power in the world exist to stop her from this. none. none. and that's the expression of the wall behind or with the nazguls.

and that in your "campus educational life experience" you can't apprehend the darkness of this reality, if...

again, not hard, if you accept reality.

simple in china she does what she wants.

simple as per the chinese ways

and different else where

none unoified or "boleshvized".

resaid: the glorious inward empires doesn't wish you ill on your side, quite the contrary the true of yourselves over yourselves and land, be... as you wish, over yours and adding necessarily for absolute clarity : china isn't yours.

let other be and create over your own.

implies no to bolshevism as it's taking over others to create yours over them.

"don't thread on the pandas" (they may call a dragon). and you really don't want to be the "who" of asked by a dragon to a panda folled by annoying you?". as answer will be "them" as you.

is it clear enough?

OURS.

LIBERATED.

have a nice day.

remember your intents have no bearing as just emanation of your own representations, and it's normal that opposition to your will will be by yours seen as an ocean of burning lava :). (it's not what it is if you hadn't sought to impose your will over it, the calm waters).

no to ping pong balling into the uno, or pinball to uno. no.

and deepler down, to want to annihilate the existence of war, the idea of warfare, is at the end to want to suppress the idea of the liberation of china itself as form of scourge rather than the glorious liberation it is. a form of enslavement, of submission sought through the mind, less than a jelly punch, still an attempt.

don't.

and worst makes no sense in a chinese historical perspective "eternally peacefull china without need for defense" meme

lol...

comical.

abuse of koolaid.

then in the idea of the defense there can failure (s) if you look again at past historical and as such the idea of liberation, eternal. hopefully and currently realistically not necessary but in the future maybe one day, who knows, again, the "scourge" of war will befall some part of china and warfare will have to waged to again liberate china :).

sound a little repetitive but at the end with a lot of work and vigilance in all forms of warfare...

anyway.

then end like this :

again there it's just a game, she isn't dead.

but DEFEND CHINA a no return for those who decide to be those on what it will be applied :).

again it's not mean, but meaness beyond means will be applied, to defend china.

to be a source of need to apply defend china on you.

dumb and easy as that.