by not being fore-right (not fortenite), or more clarity, skew, inevitable. and in the quote above, never said. again, the power of a no. once you miss, just even a +2-2 somewhere, wait for it, there is more... understatement. accumulation skewing, the chaos pathetic or wickednism. intentional blah who cares. the unskewing, remove the filths for more clarity toward the framework of understanding. a collective work in a sense for collective use, otherwise you defer it all to others, like the "uno" or what ever above, over. anyway.
original then the skew in the framework of reference can be exploited by foreigners to foster their own things using the already divided, easy on facts. pixels, like speech, or bullets points and what ever meme catch phrases, has no meaning in the realm, not even wind.
sending javelins, and boasting, at one point... where the competency questions arise. and how so the structuring is done. and the little compare jab, Deng Xiaoping, lead example. incomparable.
enclosing in mediocrity of the path of lies at the end. you remove and move forward or sink in the pitfalls of lies, toxic work culture.
then you reach the "meaning" dilution", where everything must be checked in reference to now current dominant lie framework, this floating iced structure... anyway.
the versus is more accurate, than the : " which could lead to the false perception it wasn't a quote, rather a synthetic factual reply, to a professed conditioning.
how the point can be missed in the detail showdown. the focus trying to unskew more lead to more cohesion and unity, as the grip points of any adversary, anchoring potential, trim, and worst rather expose it's own by attrition. higher level of clarity or understanding of the reality through the framework of understanding, referential one, of a nation, the more the weaknesses of those of others are naturally exposed. "and you". boom ahah.
how too isolating this strategy, is as then rupturing, which is quite of hostilityism, at least inward, but may move outward too. integration in the threat structure. but sooner or later they will want to know what is, natural.
and how it doesn't inscribe in a further improving constant, a build, building to understand, as things change, inward and outward, too.
the famous case of the flow blockers. ayayay.
ex further the will to remain in such organizations as the euO/natO, for what they do, are and want to do, quite disturbing, while entering some meme verbal theatric shitshow, which had have no relevance in targeting : nato y/n euO y/n so simple as that. the folklore above and various decoys, irrelevant.
you go a) or b) chose.
the whole delirium of the theatrics, no meaning but for those who suckered in it. once out, the so called super law enforcement in blue tshirt, again they never saw or understood a place, the "eternal artymosk", each build zone or the whole forest lines. how meanings in theatrics, amplifying their pseudo social relevance with more theatrics, scenes and loud speaker, change nothing.
then beyond the exploitation of such moronism, as narrative interest reinforcer, like rMFA would have done or RT. "for more partnership" aka their own interests.
as such the interest of the unified reality framework of understanding based on correct answer reflecting reality or it's work in progress estimation. at one point you always a or b, in terms of is or not at least, a "rock" for exemple, there or not.
then the flexibility it allows facing changes and new learning etc, discoveries as none static by the interdependencies of teh constant growing stack of lies, leading to this toxic work culture.
terrible when the skewing "packages" are cross embedded. and this narrative there, integrated as collectively true (or safe and effective) while an utter lie, based again on the simplicity is there a "rock" there or not. ahah.
if you extend, gdp of bulgaria, they can triple their indebtedness, not much. meaning the top idiots, have problems. "more more more". okay, will see. anyway. the stack of lies, like the ferret it can run run... run.
conclusion, the deciphering of own limitations of understanding for crossinterests, to return to more lean and accurate and relevant understanding. allowing the adjustments in posturings. simple. disturbing for said parasitical interests- what ever the venom flagrance they wrap their foreign goals in.
the problem of the skewing again.
the skewing :
no skewing :
by not being fore-right (not fortenite), or more clarity, skew, inevitable. and in the quote above, never said. again, the power of a no. once you miss, just even a +2-2 somewhere, wait for it, there is more... understatement. accumulation skewing, the chaos pathetic or wickednism. intentional blah who cares. the unskewing, remove the filths for more clarity toward the framework of understanding. a collective work in a sense for collective use, otherwise you defer it all to others, like the "uno" or what ever above, over. anyway.
original then the skew in the framework of reference can be exploited by foreigners to foster their own things using the already divided, easy on facts. pixels, like speech, or bullets points and what ever meme catch phrases, has no meaning in the realm, not even wind.
sending javelins, and boasting, at one point... where the competency questions arise. and how so the structuring is done. and the little compare jab, Deng Xiaoping, lead example. incomparable.
enclosing in mediocrity of the path of lies at the end. you remove and move forward or sink in the pitfalls of lies, toxic work culture.
then you reach the "meaning" dilution", where everything must be checked in reference to now current dominant lie framework, this floating iced structure... anyway.
enjoy and hf in the shattering of it.
the versus is more accurate, than the : " which could lead to the false perception it wasn't a quote, rather a synthetic factual reply, to a professed conditioning.
how the point can be missed in the detail showdown. the focus trying to unskew more lead to more cohesion and unity, as the grip points of any adversary, anchoring potential, trim, and worst rather expose it's own by attrition. higher level of clarity or understanding of the reality through the framework of understanding, referential one, of a nation, the more the weaknesses of those of others are naturally exposed. "and you". boom ahah.
how too isolating this strategy, is as then rupturing, which is quite of hostilityism, at least inward, but may move outward too. integration in the threat structure. but sooner or later they will want to know what is, natural.
and how it doesn't inscribe in a further improving constant, a build, building to understand, as things change, inward and outward, too.
the famous case of the flow blockers. ayayay.
ex further the will to remain in such organizations as the euO/natO, for what they do, are and want to do, quite disturbing, while entering some meme verbal theatric shitshow, which had have no relevance in targeting : nato y/n euO y/n so simple as that. the folklore above and various decoys, irrelevant.
you go a) or b) chose.
the whole delirium of the theatrics, no meaning but for those who suckered in it. once out, the so called super law enforcement in blue tshirt, again they never saw or understood a place, the "eternal artymosk", each build zone or the whole forest lines. how meanings in theatrics, amplifying their pseudo social relevance with more theatrics, scenes and loud speaker, change nothing.
a or b?
there is no virtualization there.
and you can't salami slice a or b.
then beyond the exploitation of such moronism, as narrative interest reinforcer, like rMFA would have done or RT. "for more partnership" aka their own interests.
as such the interest of the unified reality framework of understanding based on correct answer reflecting reality or it's work in progress estimation. at one point you always a or b, in terms of is or not at least, a "rock" for exemple, there or not.
then the flexibility it allows facing changes and new learning etc, discoveries as none static by the interdependencies of teh constant growing stack of lies, leading to this toxic work culture.
sharing is caring, isn't ?
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/european-union-debt-to-gdp-by-country/
axax
anyway, like the so vaunted case of the burning theater...
just a detail irrelevant, the real problem the spread of the skewin narrative, as accepted, or unflagged as enemy work.
nothing force outside the magician showarea, to obey his command of not thinking that, asking this, or show that (where the "hidden" is (+a-a)).
doing so would foster this skewing, "just one more". anyway
terrible when the skewing "packages" are cross embedded. and this narrative there, integrated as collectively true (or safe and effective) while an utter lie, based again on the simplicity is there a "rock" there or not. ahah.
extend : what is cheaper selling weapons or talking peace?
if you extend, gdp of bulgaria, they can triple their indebtedness, not much. meaning the top idiots, have problems. "more more more". okay, will see. anyway. the stack of lies, like the ferret it can run run... run.
conclusion, the deciphering of own limitations of understanding for crossinterests, to return to more lean and accurate and relevant understanding. allowing the adjustments in posturings. simple. disturbing for said parasitical interests- what ever the venom flagrance they wrap their foreign goals in.
duh