Want to protest 'shithole' cities. Why not stage a 'shit in'?
I was in a punny mood I guess as I was discussing how people in leftists/liberal locations like San Francisco are moving from such places as they turn into literal shitholes. The problem. They don't learn from their mistakes. They move somewhere else and they start making the same mistakes they made at their former home.
San Francisco literally spawned the poo map app so people could try to avoid parts of town where people might encounter human feces from defecation on the sidewalks and such.
The homelessness rates have skyrocketed and it is not due to being bums. A lot of the homeless have jobs, they just cannot afford the cost of housing. This is not surprising considering some single room homes have sold for over $2.3 million.
People talk about encountering needles on seats in BART which is their transportation system. They made it no longer a felony crime to knowingly have sex with someone when you have HIV without informing them. In other words, it is okay to knowingly give someone a death sentence without their knowing, you might get a small fine.
The cases of hepatitis and many other things have been on a sharp increase. This occurs in other parts of California and in other liberal bastions around the country. San Francisco (silicon valley) simply seems to be the epicenter.
Furthermore, it is a sanctuary city. So even though they have homeless actual U.S. citizens with their share of "dreams" they are focused on sheltering ILLEGAL immigrants (aka invaders), putting them on welfare, DACA, etc and further exasperating the problem they already have.
I live in a northern suburb of Denver. This means I do not actually live in DENVER city where the craziness is spreading.
Denver declared itself a sanctuary city, and I frequently saw homeless people, soup kitchens, etc downtown before they did that.
They also recently made it legal to urinate and defecate on the sidewalks in Denver.
Today I was talking with some co-workers about the fact that Denver was being considered as one of the prospects for Amazon's new HQ2 which is supposed to be decided this year.
This made me wonder if part of the reason we are repeating the same mistakes (definition of insanity) is to try to woo Amazon.
One of my co-workers made this comment:
"@Deva Winblood : We should visit and shit on the BART seats. That way we can feel like a native. "
A minute later I made the following one:
"Now that Denver allows it we should go downtown in mass and have a shit in"
Thus, I came up with the first reference to 'Shit In' as a form of protest I am aware of.
Shit In
It should be noted that human biological waste should be considered a potential deadly biological agent. If it has illnesses and other things it can be hazardous for people to encounter.
Thus, when people like antifa are hurling grenades of human feces and urine at people it technically could be considered a biological attack. It certainly is not PEACEFUL protesting, and is therefore not LEGAL protesting.
Will we begin to see "Shit Ins"?
it's just the road to becoming 3rd world. That's what socialism gives to everybody (except the politicians of course)
Somethings just can not be made up. If it is legal then the first shit isn should be on the steps up to the city's capitol building.
Now that's a plan I could give a shit about.
;-)
Ahhh terrifying! About that proposed wall, maybe it should
go right down the middle of the country instead. Keep that
crap over on the left hand side : -)
There are liberal bastions in other parts of the country. So it's too late for a wall down the middle to stop them. :)
Instead of democrats versus republicans, it needs to be people that think crapping in the street is okay versus people that don't think it is okay. Then build an inpentratable wall with high voltage wires set to "Jurassic Park T-Rex Enclosure" level between the two groups.
It is like watching lunatics run a country, from afar, I can only say I am glad I do not live there. Yuck.
Highly rEsteemed!
I'm looking forward to a DC Sh!t In.
Heh. Has DC made it legal to shit on the sidewalks like San Francisco and Denver?
Liberals bring floods of non-productive freeloader type people to places where they live so that these people can avail themselves to all the freebies that we pay for. Then, the liberals discover that these people are a nuissance and their homes are unlivable so they move somewhere nice (non-liberal) and start their same nonsense all over again. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results and liberalism is a mental disorder.
Looks like she beat ya too it. :)
-Woman shits in the coffee shop and throws feces at employees.
This is just so horrible. I can't imagine. There are literally no words. When humans act like un-trained animals, they need to be locked in cages. Even most animals don't act like this. There's something clearly lacking in this person's brain.
Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)
Relevance: Countering the MSM.
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 150+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Ways you can help the @informationwar
Just dropped by to mention that Colorado is the home of the Arapahoe people, among other native tribes. The word Colorado doesn't come from the english language. And that there were Latinos in Colorado before there were Europeans... So who is the invader?
One final thing, there has been an ongoing shitin in the capital of the USA for over 500 years.
Yes and if those people still ran the place then everyone would be running around in loin cloths and throwing spears at buffalo. Everything that makes this country a place where everyone wants to live was brought in by the white Europeans - the people you refer to as invaders. Prior to their arrival there was no country of natives as you seem to imagine. There was no infrastructure or anythign else. Just over 500 separate nomadic tribes of primitive hunter gatherers following the herds of buffalo. The unadvanced cultures always fall to the more advanced ones, otherwise civilization would never evolve.
P.S. In case you didn't realize this, the "Latinos" are descendants of Spanish people. Spain is also in Europe last time I checked. The Spanish conquistadors invaded Mexico and killed the native Indians there like the Aztecs and the Mayans, so hispanc (descendants of the Spanish) people are every bit as much "invaders" as the settlers that came to the land that is now the US.
My father is full blooded, and let me assure you on his behalf, the genocide is ongoing. Get over it? Well how about honoring the treaties instead of being whiteman givers?
Nevermind, I know you don't have that ability, I just want you to recognize that the land there north of Denver was illegally stolen through genocide despite the treaties, as you know you can't trust the government.
It's not over, and in the past. Native people who lived in Colorado long before the spanish arrived are still living there. They still are discriminated against by law enforcement and ignorant people who were lied to by historians. Again, the sand creek massacre and the like were carried out despite treaties, and the treaties which are considered to be the supreme law of the land are not being obeyed. Can't trust the government. But let's pretend you are a good citizen, do you ignore the supreme law of the land? or are you a good law abiding citizen?
Never mind that.
Just do your part to learn about the facts. I can tell you are a person who is interested in being well informed. The treaties were violated. There is an role for citizens to end the land theft and genocide. If only they can face the fact that we are still being killed.
No one is forcing the citizens to continue to violate the treaties, it's just cowards justify further genocide and land theft.
Come to terms with these words, this is all stolen land. The doctrine of discovery is shit for justification of genocide.
As far as shit ins go, I still say there have been five hundred years of shit ins.
Also I'd like to tell you that you have my respect. You responded quite well in the wake of my intentional assholishness. Well done. ;) That is what I was hoping for and pleasantly surprised you did it.
EDIT: Though I now realized this was not a response to me. You didn't respond to my asshole comment. ;)
And who did the native Americans steal it from, huh? Probably people less advanced than themselves. You are the one that needs to get over it, as you sit and stew in sublime hypocrisy living with all the comforts of life and technology brought to you by the same white people that you call invaders and espouse hatred for. If the Chinese or some other more advanced civilization had gotten here first, you would not be here to voice your gripes today because they would have simply slaughtered all of your ancestors or taken them as slaves and certainly not allowed them to have familes.
When present day oppression is justified and modern day genocide is ignored, the people who are responsible will likely continue those behaviors rather than be accountable for them.
I understand you don't want to be accountable for halting genocide. Just remember, you chose to ignore the treaties. You chose to obey unjust laws. The option to be a good person is yours. But my guess is that instead of choosing righteousness you will perpetuate injustice. Because you refuse to learn from the past.
No one is committing genocide in the US today so just stop it. You want to see genocide, look at what is going on in South Africa, Rwanda, etc. You are inflaming hostility for no reason. I didn't make any treaty with you. I didn't kill anyone and I'm not the one being hateful and racist here. You are. If you wonder why you perceive others as having an attitude towards you, perhaps you should look in the mirror and try to tone down your hostility towards an entire group of people who have literally done nothing to wrong you, yet you treat as if they have.
I thought I'd add. There are likely some people alive in Alaska that had some of their territory seized. There are indigenous people that were impacted by Alaska related things in the 1950s.
Other than that no one living has had their territory seized. They didn't lose anything. Their ancestors definitely did, but that is TRUE of every group of people on the planet. It is what happens. It is even known to have happened extensively among the "native americans".
Part of Colorado I lived in was the Utes. Every inch of the planet except maybe Antarctica was occupied by different people. The "Native Americans" (of which I am part of three tribes though my skin is white) also fought among each other in history and seized territory.
If there is a nation and you cross it's borders against the laws of that land. That is invasion.
Also unless you have a time machine and it WAS YOU that this was done to then grow up and get over it.
Otherwise, I can go back in history and find ancestors that were victimized some way.
If it wasn't done to you then shut the fuck up because you are no victim. (EDIT: Removed 'Just stupid' as I don't think you are stupid)
If you were a victim then you should be marketing your time machine.
And if I offended you. Good! Life is offensive. Get over it and quit acting like a damn victim.
As to Colorado... Spain gave that land to the U.S. So they stole it. They exchanged it.
Yet all of those people and any potential victims from that have been long dead.
NOT A SINGLE PERSON LIVING is a victim of that.
EDIT: And yes this is harsh. I am tired of political correctness and everyone whining about offense and hurt feelings. That is a mind plague that needs to be excised. So I am at times intentionally harsh. That is why.
That's the thing I was trying to say. But in reality, the native Americans simply occupied parts of North America and Alaska. There were over 500 separate tribes. Most didn't know of each others existance and the ones that did, many were at war and killing each other. There was no "nation". Just many completely separate groups of nomadic people living a very primitive life. Also, most of the Native American Indian tribes came over here across a land bridge and were not original inhabitants either. There's no way that a literal handful of people living this way could have or should have held onto a huge land mass. Its contratry to the evolution of human civilization. Imagine the state of humanity if everyone that found the continent said "Oh well. There's some scattered tribes of primitive people sporadically scattered around this huge land mass. So we better go."? LOL. Really. The bottom line is that the strong and more advanced always supercede. Civiliation would never evolve otherwise. And basically nothing is really "yours" if you are unwilling or unable to defend it. That's why the US has a strong military and the Constution gives citizens the right to keeep and bear arms. If we had no military, does anyone believe China or Russia or some other country would not invade us immediately?
P.S Dwinblood, I think you're awesome!