RE: Why not mining with four posts a day?
You are welcome @lichtblick. Your posting is very useful in fork–times and must be spread to all the miners. Unfortunally most of them doesn't read a lot. We have a very poor readers rate of approx. 5%.
Thank you for your positive feedback. I was a little bit afraid to post this content because the one or other blogger will recognize himself in the mirror of my writing. Maybe I will lose votes or followers. But the truth has to be spoken.
Of course, the 100% upvote is the sincere expression of respect for a blogger. I have no understanding for these percent ghost voters. No power but fiddeling the slider. Maybe this is a kind of substitute satisfaction because of the lack of power. The only what they show with their zero votes is not understanding Steemit at all.
Thanks for sharing your pont of view .
This gives an better understanding of such complex situations.
To the point of the slidermoving voters, my guess is that they vote so much as they can with the hope that the others will vote them back. Anyway for me not problem even thanks for that small vote.
Hopefully we will gain more active readers. I have to admit that I read not every post- espacially as i am supporting people from venezuela- that is my charity/ crowdfunding aspect why I am on steemit ;-)
But to speak the true I am here for the money too and I am not feeling shamed about that ;-) Keep up your good work.
Thank you very much for your kindness, @lichtblick. I'm here for the STEEM as well. Who for heaven sake is not! But I immediately loved the role of curators in this serious earning game. Curating, as a center point of the White Paper, makes a lot of sense because only curating brings soul into this earning–job. A curator has a kind of responsibility on the Steem and I take this job very serious. I'm also proud and thankful to be enabled doing such an important job for the miners community.