[Summary] : SLC29-W4 | History Glitch

kouba01 (82)Team SLC | Februaryin Steem POD Team • 9 days ago

_{Edited by Canva}

Hello Steemians,

Week 4 pushed the map into a new dimension: time distortion, living memory, and “places where the past refuses to stay quiet.”
This time, the mission was:

Where does history “glitch” in your area — where the past suddenly overlaps with today?

Participants had to choose a real place, pin it on SteemAtlas, explain the historical context, write a short personal narrative with a clear “past vs present” overlap, include 2–4 original photos, upload a Speem.watch proof video (20–60s) stating one historical FACT and showing one visible DETAIL, and add a Hidden Numerical Clue (a number/date puzzle for others to guess).
Week 4 also required visible engagement: attempting to solve other participants’ hidden clues through comments.

This week produced a strong variety of “glitches”: abandoned colonial infrastructure, national monuments, sacred sites, cultural heritage layers, community-built roads, and traditional shops that still breathe old life inside modern streets.

Week 4 Statistics

Total participants reviewed	18
SteemAtlas pins included	18 / 18
Proof video provided (Speem/IPFS/YouTube)	17 / 18
Speem.watch/IPFS proof clearly present (strict format)	11 / 18
Hidden Numerical Clue clearly present (one target, solvable puzzle)	7 / 18
Minimum engagement confirmed (guessing at least two other hidden clues)	1 / 18

Score Verification Note

All final scores used in this report are the official jury totals and are mathematically consistent with the rubric (sum of the 5 criteria equals the final score for every reviewed entry).

Post Quality Snapshot

The most common Week 4 weaknesses were:

Missing or weak hidden number/date puzzle (many posts mentioned numbers but did not build a clear solvable clue).
Speem compliance gap: using YouTube only where Speem.watch/IPFS proof was required.
“FACT + DETAIL” not explicit (video existed but the post didn’t clearly state: “In my video I say (FACT) and I show (DETAIL)”).
Engagement not visible (no clear proof of solving at least two other clues).
Historical anchor too vague (strong vibe, but missing one concrete date/year/plaque/sign reference).

High quality (8.5 – 10)	5 posts	Clear history anchor, strong “glitch” feeling, correct media proof, and a functional numerical puzzle.
Good (7.5 – 8.49)	2 posts	Solid entries, but missing 1 key strength (puzzle clarity, Speem strictness, or engagement proof).
Needs improvement (Below 7.5)	11 posts	Most often missing a true hidden numerical clue and/or strict Speem/IPFS proof + engagement proof.

Top 6 Winners – Week 4

Rank	Author	History Glitch Location	Score (/10)	Why it stood out	Post Link
1	@lunasilver	Iglesia Matriz de Villa de Cura (Aragua, Venezuela)	9.5	Best full execution: rich verified dates + excellent hidden clue leading to 1960 + strong past/present overlap + engagement fully met.	View post
2	@ripon0630	Chittagong Old Railway Station (Chattogram, Bangladesh)	9.1	Top-tier “abandoned landmark” glitch: strong anchor (1896), fair clue, and very vivid decay-vs-memory atmosphere.	View post
3	@marwene	Médersa Slimania (Tunis, Tunisia)	8.8	One of the most original interpretations: “glitch” as cultural mislabeling + excellent proof video execution and strong narrative structure.	View post
4	@max-pro	National Martyrs' Monument (Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh)	8.7	Visitor-friendly pin + meaningful national memory site; strong visuals and historical framing around 1971.	View post
5	@mahadisalim	Hatirjheel Project / Lake (Dhaka, Bangladesh)	8.5	Great “modern history glitch”: transformation backed by dates (2007–2013) + clear on-site proof and strong concept.	View post
6	@dove11	Peer Baba Ki Mazar (Meerut, India)	8.3	Creative “myth + trace evidence” structure with a strong hidden clue concept; close to top tier with cleaner number focus + engagement proof.	View post

Community Highlights

Best Hidden Numerical Clue

@lunasilver delivered the clearest, fairest clue design: a clean path that guides readers straight to 1960 without confusion.

Best “History Still Visible” Atmosphere

@ripon0630 captured the strongest abandoned-history mood, where the past is physically readable in the present.

Best Proof Video Structure (FACT + DETAIL)

@marwene came closest to perfect execution: clear claim + visual evidence with strong framing and sequencing.

Best Modern History Twist

@mahadisalim proved Week 4 is not only about ruins — a city project can also be a “glitch” when the old reality disappears into a new landmark.

Honorable Mention (Just Outside Top 6)

@bijoy1 (8.3) brought a strong community-memory concept (a road as living history) and solid Speem/IPFS proof.

Jury Notes for Week 5 Improvement

Hide ONE number/date only — make it solvable (avoid multiple distracting numbers).
Use Speem.watch/IPFS proof cleanly (avoid “YouTube only” when strict proof is required).
Video must be 20–60 seconds and should clearly match the rule: one FACT spoken + one DETAIL shown close-up.
Separate verified history vs oral story when both exist (fact layer stays clear).
Engagement must be visible: solve at least two other hidden clues through comments (add links/screenshots if possible).

All Verified Scores (Week 4)

@lunasilver — 9.5
@ripon0630 — 9.1
@marwene — 8.8
@max-pro — 8.7
@mahadisalim — 8.5
@dove11 — 8.3
@bijoy1 — 8.3
@muzack1 — 7.4
@narocky71 — 7.2
@tasonya — 6.8
@samsunnaharsuity — 5.4
@josepha — 5.6
@nhriyad — 5.9
@jamal7 — 5.9
@ahp93 — 5.0
@fasoniya — 5.0
@mhmaruf — 4.9
@jannat7 — 4.8

Closing Words

Week 4 proved that our world map is not only geographic — it is temporal.
Each pin became a “crack in time”: a station that still remembers crowds, a church that carries centuries, a monument where history stands guard, a city project that erased an old reality, and shops where yesterday still sells quietly today.

Congratulations to the Top 6 winners, and thank you to everyone who explored, filmed, encoded, guessed, and interacted.

— @kouba01