Pretty much what I was thinking. Thanks. Too much written about what time to hit the vote button, and who'll get what. For 99.9% of us, the answer is not a lot!
Land a well timed vote with a comment (early on imo) and you've got a months worth of curation value right there.
I think you guys are completely in agreement regarding what you mean by worth it.
I just wanna point out that maximizing financial return isn't the point of curation.
The point is supposed to be promoting content that you like, so that the creator is motivated to do more and better creation, and lotsa people get to see it.
Not being critical of you guys personally, honest. I just want to find a way to actually achieve that purpose of promoting content.
So, I ask, what changes in Steemit might return curation to it's original stated purpose, from the wealth creation strategy it seems to have become?
Curation has been crushed a little by HF-19 and the reward pool payment changes. Over the next few months were truly going to see how things have changed??
I am not somehow intent on denigrating acquisition of wealth, but I do see Steemit as more than that, and see that focus on growing wealth seems to have been pitted against promoting content creation in Steemit's present formulation.
I am seeking ideas on how to eliminate that conflict. How to achieve the stated goal of Steemit to reward content creation and curation as a primary goal, rather than subsume that purpose to pursuit of financial reward, and wealth creation.
Ha ha! I wish I did ... I wish I'd ninja pre-mined one trillion coins :)
Worry not, I got .02 sitting pretty for you 😎
Back covered by the Asher. Super cool!😎
😁
I have to ask your opinion on Curation - I mean, it's not really worth it is it? What are your views?
Greater than 100K SP = worth it
<100K SP = not worth it
Pretty much what I was thinking. Thanks. Too much written about what time to hit the vote button, and who'll get what. For 99.9% of us, the answer is not a lot!
Land a well timed vote with a comment (early on imo) and you've got a months worth of curation value right there.
I got a $44 comment earlier today! BINGO!!
I've just seen it ya jammy bugger!!!
I blogged about the pointlessness of curation for minnows, couldn't resist!
I think you guys are completely in agreement regarding what you mean by worth it.
I just wanna point out that maximizing financial return isn't the point of curation.
The point is supposed to be promoting content that you like, so that the creator is motivated to do more and better creation, and lotsa people get to see it.
Not being critical of you guys personally, honest. I just want to find a way to actually achieve that purpose of promoting content.
So, I ask, what changes in Steemit might return curation to it's original stated purpose, from the wealth creation strategy it seems to have become?
Curation has been crushed a little by HF-19 and the reward pool payment changes. Over the next few months were truly going to see how things have changed??
Yes, but..
I am not somehow intent on denigrating acquisition of wealth, but I do see Steemit as more than that, and see that focus on growing wealth seems to have been pitted against promoting content creation in Steemit's present formulation.
I am seeking ideas on how to eliminate that conflict. How to achieve the stated goal of Steemit to reward content creation and curation as a primary goal, rather than subsume that purpose to pursuit of financial reward, and wealth creation.
Any ideas?