You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: How can the Steem blockchain distinguish itself in the marketplace?

in #steemlast year (edited)

Well, so "my dream" is shown very reduced... ;-)
Of course, this is utopia. But it doesn't have to be utopia that responsible curators and - above all - really interested people look for exactly this and set signs in this way. But the fact that exactly this is probably also utopia frustrates me a bit right now... ;-)

  • Voting CSI
    Nothing easier than to drive this one up the wall. And in a way that does not really correspond to the former idea of curation...

  • Reputation
    The reputation became questionable as soon as the first buy-vote bots appeared. The intervention of the whale called sc01 in the voting process (and of course the upvu & co) has made it a meaningless number.

  • number of followers (why not?)
    Why not? Because the „follower“ arise more, the higher your stake. I have many followers - most of them do not care. But anytime I vote somebody, I did not so far, there is a new one… ;-D

Hey, this really isn't meant to sound too negative and I appreciate your enthusiasm. But please take off those rose-colored glasses before they fall off....
Still too negative? Hm.
If I had applied to be a sc for April (like actually thought about it for a brief moment), I would have wanted to collaborate with you! Only with you... 😎

Nice that your appearance in the discussion is proof that there are still articles that are not written just for one day...

Edit:
I forgot something very important!
Remember? „Who if not you?!“
Congratulations!!!

Sort:  

Congratulations!!!

Thanks, actually I didn't expect to be chosen.

I like how you leave no stone unturned from imperfect proposals. This allows us to ultimately arrive at something better.

I am still in favor of changing the distribution of rewards. But now I have a better idea. I believe that the number of unique views and the average time spent by the reader on the page should be hidden in the calculation of both author's and curatorial rewards.

Under these conditions, outright spam will receive small rewards even if it is voted by a bot. Owners of a large number of SP will have to look for a readership. Of course, this will not solve all problems, but it will significantly reduce the attractiveness of bid bots.

Thanks... ;-)
Only that I do not come up with good ideas myself afterwards, I do not like. May be the so long already tortured blinders... ;-)

Your idea with the view counter is brilliant.
The frontend once had a view counter. Even at the time when there were already auto-voters (must have been partly very frustrating for some ambitious writers). At some point it disappeared - and I miss it a lot.
Did it disappear with the buy vote bots? A rogue who thinks evil of it... ;-)

TEAM MILLIONAIRE

Congratulations, your comment has been successfully curated by @o1eh at 10%.

Oh, vielen Dank... :-))

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.28
TRX 0.13
JST 0.032
BTC 61113.33
ETH 2927.99
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.69