You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: We Need Your Help to Protect Steem
Why they put only few accounts in block list? There should be more.
HIVE also not give many steemians airdrop. They don't like steem, so they created HIVE.
Why they put only few accounts in block list? There should be more.
HIVE also not give many steemians airdrop. They don't like steem, so they created HIVE.
If someone creates something without you, do you feel entitled to it? The airdrop was just that, a gift which no one is entitled to. I didn't agree with locking any accounts beyond the Steemit ninja-mined stake accounts, but I was overruled. That's how consensus works. No single person gets to make all the rules.
You seem to think it's okay to remove stake of people you don't like. SF22.2 had a completely different purpose which many individual witnesses posted about directly. It was temporary and intended to determine the intention of Justin who was, up until that point, not communicating effectively with the community.
@lukestokes I respect you. Your thoughts are very clear.
I understand the airdrop concept but this was given to all steemians except some steemians, those have different opinion from them. That's not fair, opinion can be different. They provided Hive to steem holders not anyone else. I am not agree with the concept of him.
The SF 0.22.2 had the same thing, they fear with Mr. Justin Sun thoughts and block the account. This was not good. Same thing they repeated, block the hive airdrop.
It means if anyone can't communicate correctly, they will block the account of anyone. That's the fact. The @themarkymark still blacklisted me for having different opinion. He didn't want to listen others voice. What is the problem if anyone buy the steem in large quantity, if they have problem ask to Mr. @ned, not to other. I 100% disagree with action taken by them for both incident.
We all can have a point of discussion. You are right, I am right and they will be right. But each have their priorities and act accordingly. For say i can say they have fear of their witness status gone (control over steemit), so they do this. Fear can be anything, what is right or wrong or imagery we can not decide. If i put my point strong with this statement that my thoughts is 100% correct "they have done witness voting disable for 30 days for new HIVE powerup". So that anyone can't takeover HIVE, they want their control, if anyone try their, they have 30 days to lock their accounts. You can put the same thing in different way with your point of view. You may be also right. But we all see what is going on, each have their different interest. Accordingly they divert the discussion.
All Is Well, All Is Well.
Say end is well.
Thanks for all, I respect you.
You were blacklisted for stealing other photographer's works and upvoting them for hundreds of dollars with bid bots. Your opinion had no part in anything and don't even know what your opinion was.
@themarkymark @buildawhale
I have many times told you that I was wedding planner in the name of 'vCare' wedding planner at Udaipur, India about 4years ago. I have the thouands of wedding photos with me and those are not stealing from other photographer's. I have the ownership of them. And I proved that on many platform on steemit. If you want, i can prove that. I don't understand, why you don't want to hear this and always told 'stealing other photographer's work'. That's not fair. Please, not order as judge without hearing others point. It is always upto you, what you think.
If you don't want to hear and understand, no one can present their point. That's it.
This wasn't about opinion. This was about actively attacking the chain and centralizing it. That is unacceptable and witnesses have the job to protect the chain. I didn't agree with excluding more than the Steemit ninja-mined stake (which I mentioned here) but I was overruled. The proposal system on Hive is still available for those who feel they should not have been excluded.
I disagree, but I understand why some see it this way. What was done in 22.8888 did not have community consensus and was controlled by one person. The witnesses who didn't agree were voted out completely by one person. 22.2 had vast amount of support from many different apps, token holders, and witnesses. It was done as a temporary measure to truly understand Justin's intentions.
No, that's not at all what it means, and it's ignorant of the history and facts to suggest so. Justin and Tron directly threatened the chain saying everything would move to Tron, did not effectively answer questions in the AMA, voted that same week with Tron Foundation tokens on his own chain, and also purchased around 20% of the tokens that were specifically meant to benefit the Steem ecosystem. Those tokens were different than any other tokens which is why the situation with Justin was different than any other situation. It's not just about owning a large quantity of tokens. I disagree with many here who have a large quantity of tokens but I would never lock their tokens up, nor would the other consensus witnesses. These tokens were very different and this has been explained many times in individual witness posts and the soft fork 22.2 announcement post.
This has nothing to do with status and everything to do with the security of the chain. A centralized blockchain is not a blockchain and it will lose all value!
I hope you and the community who agree with you understand this before all the value you think you have here goes away. Tokens without a community are worthless and tokens controlled by a centralized entity are pointless.
First, NO attack to chain, They have safegard their funds. That was blocked by old witnenss without vaild reasons, only fear was their. If anyone do this with you, what will you do. We will do whatever in our hands. So, Frist attack on blockchain done by old witness after takeover done by Justin, whatever in his hands he done to protect his funds.
What will proposal do on Hive? If they don't ready to hear any voice. And as you said earlier this was airdrop and whom to deliver is upto them. That is not our right, if they want to give, give. Why proposal needed? I don't like this proposal phenomena.
I agree with you that 22.888 has done by this way, but this is what HIVE has done is replica of that. Hive blocked many accounts airdrop and Steemit blocked only few accounts. Think it other way. Who knows anyone intention?
Yes, all is already discussed before the fork. If only community has a value, NO WAY. All has the value, everyone has value. Without investors, No community has value and Without community, No investor is their. So both are vice-versa. No one can win without others. Both required each other.
Both chain has different type of centralization. or say decentralization. We only require, eyes to see that.
Lol fuck you
@ericwilson Start you nice work.
You are a slave to Justin.
No honor.
Only shame.
It is upto you. But i aspect from you Honor for all.
Please, speak polite, this always good for all. Think over it. Thoughts may different, but language should be good always. Keep improving. May i wrong.
Thanks.You can now stop sucking my dig.
I knew you are not Mr. Justin. Thanks for your efforts.