I think there is a miscommunication here, and this may be caused by hyperbole and language barriers, but there is a disconnect between the communities. Hopefully I can clear some things up:

First, just to get an idea of my perspective, I am a low ranked witness, but I never ran the soft fork. I didn't agree with it then, and don't agree with it now. I have also been hosting and participating in hours long conversations with community members for well over a week now about this situation, so I have a good idea on what people are actually saying rather than how it's being perceived. That being said, I only speak for myself.

The problem with @triple.aaa being in the top 20 isn't the fact that Koreans support them, or the fact that they're unqualified to be there. It's the fact that steemit inc and the exchanges are using custodial stake to make that happen. This situation would be the same whether Koreans supported them or not, the important variable is Steemit Inc is colluding with exchanges to overturn governance.

Most of us are here to be on an decentralized model and build our home. If it's not decentralized, we are going to try and fix that, or fork and move to another chain. The Korean community is a great asset to steem, but please don't let your thirst for representation blind you to the point of ruining the platform.