You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Feedback Wanted: 4 Week Power Down

in #steem6 years ago

Are you in favour of this proposal or rather in favor of a dynamic power-down period? Because this proposal will only allow people to choose between 4 and 13 weeks. That's still far too rigid for the diverse culture we have here.

p.s.: I invested over $40K my personal money on Steem, powering up, and never power down till now, and the money becomes less than $3K. But I DID NOT POWER DOWN BECAUSE of the 13 weeks power-down period. People who need power down will do anyway regardless of the power down period limitation, and this SHOULDN'T be our core to maintain.

Just making sure I understood this correctly:

You didn't power down, because of the 13 weeks period? Afterwards, you're writing that "people who need to power--down will do that, regardless of the period limitation". Isn't this exactly the opposite of your reasoning?

Sort:  

I agree with the 4 weeks power down period (I'm sorry but I'm not aware of the dynamic power down period you mentioned). Thanks for your comment. I fixed some confusing words.

He should have used a double negative. What he meant is: I did not not powerdown because of the 13 weeks period.

As in, he kept his stake for Steem reasons, not friction reasons.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.06
TRX 0.28
JST 0.048
BTC 68993.82
ETH 2030.08
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.50