I'm just curious about why accounts such as @freedom and @mottler (who has not been involved on this Hive fork and even have been inactive for years) are included on the list...
There may be mistake, this can be solved.
If they think that wrongly chosen for account freeze, they can apply for SPS proposal and community vote for it (same like as Hive).
Let me ask you something, what would happen if somebody went to a financial institution and took by mistake 3 million dollars? They're get clean by saying oh I took it by mistake then please let community judge if it was fair or not??? All transactions are public, there's nothing you should ask to community about these accounts... No transactions were made by them during the Hive vs Steem events, there's no way you can proof that even if those accounts have some transactions with the targeted accounts (I do t know if this is the case, I'm just guessing they have cuz otherwise this is even worse than it already seems) they are actually owned by the same person, you cannot go and take.millions of dollars based on vague assumptions...
These is just common sense, just in the way people who's supporting Steem right know voiced their disapproval for prior witnesses freezing Steemit INC's funds because of assumptions of possible actions (actions that sadly have been confirmed, granting them the opportunity to say a huge "I told you so" to everyone who disapproved they softfork, myself included), you and everyone on the platform should oppose this... Otherwise your initial claims against prior.steem witnesses loose whatever high ground they could have...
According to the HF announcement, there will be SPS proposal as you suggested.
I'm just curious about why accounts such as @freedom and @mottler (who has not been involved on this Hive fork and even have been inactive for years) are included on the list...
There may be mistake, this can be solved.
If they think that wrongly chosen for account freeze, they can apply for SPS proposal and community vote for it (same like as Hive).
Let me ask you something, what would happen if somebody went to a financial institution and took by mistake 3 million dollars? They're get clean by saying oh I took it by mistake then please let community judge if it was fair or not??? All transactions are public, there's nothing you should ask to community about these accounts... No transactions were made by them during the Hive vs Steem events, there's no way you can proof that even if those accounts have some transactions with the targeted accounts (I do t know if this is the case, I'm just guessing they have cuz otherwise this is even worse than it already seems) they are actually owned by the same person, you cannot go and take.millions of dollars based on vague assumptions...
These is just common sense, just in the way people who's supporting Steem right know voiced their disapproval for prior witnesses freezing Steemit INC's funds because of assumptions of possible actions (actions that sadly have been confirmed, granting them the opportunity to say a huge "I told you so" to everyone who disapproved they softfork, myself included), you and everyone on the platform should oppose this... Otherwise your initial claims against prior.steem witnesses loose whatever high ground they could have...