You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Cookie Crumbs 3: Accountsquatting with a Bonus & Addressing a Neccessary Change in HF20
Right I see, I wasn't really aware that was a problem on those networks too - I don't use them much myself.
I remember Google did some verification by postal address for business services, it was quick and no less convenient than the currently delayed signup process, it is probably cost prohibitive for Steem Inc. though.
Yes, and considering they want to "onboard millions of new users", I think removing the cost to themselves is one of the driving arguments in their current approach. From what I understand this does effectively also remove the incentive for excessive multi-accounting but I am not entirely certain if this is really comes without new issues, allowing a minimum bandwidth without any available vesting?!
I'm concerned about this bandwidth without corresponding vestings thing... the foundation for that model seemed very well considered by Dan, and this looks to me to undermine it.