You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Third Test Livestream; Steemit Update
When you say "us" I assume you're reffering to Team Bernie, and not blatantly speaking on the community's behalf, correct?
When you say "us" I assume you're reffering to Team Bernie, and not blatantly speaking on the community's behalf, correct?
.....per our conversation below, just when did you not have a right to say this without retribution?
There is no right to evade curation, what right does anyone have to express themselves without in turn people subsequently expressing themselves about it?
Posted using Partiko Android
It's called make a counter comment, that spurs debate, when people are allowed to use fear and intimidation by means of power there is no debate. Period. You can have no punitive rights attached to commenting.
There's no such thing. Not everything is about debating. It's curation, simply put it is his right to rate my work as he wishes.
Posted using Partiko Android
As long as you want to go down with a sinking ship, which this platform is. One's only avenue should be not to up vote or reward you for your comment, extra punitive damage doesn't need to be done.
Why doesn't it need to be done? Have you read the literature on game theory and how punishment and rewards NEED to go together so that certain behaviors can be curbed? You can make any asserting nonsense you wish that people have the option of not rewarding but any and all good curation systems function exclusively outside the lalaland of "positive reviews". You finagled your way now, into denying any meaningful use for flagging, so why do you want a committee anyway?
Posted using Partiko Android
In terms of abuse or censorship....you don't get to claim that this is a decentralized platform prohibitive of censorship then give everyone the right not only to censor but to also enable them to stalk and censor you into oblivion if they so choose, it's the most totalitarian form of censorship on the planet as it stands on it's current grounds. There is no MSM force or blog site that allows for punitive damages of comments, I can see it use as it pertains to abuse of the terms of service but you will never get me to agree that people should lose their revenue just because someone opposed or had a different opinion on a subject, or that it is continue to be allowed go beyond a comment and strike down everything that person may comment or post for as long as the offended so desires. You are way off course in regards to comparison of censorship styles there is nobody worse then Steemit.
You cannot call curation censorship, you cannot call censorship rating. You clearly don't understand what censorship is and isn't.
It's not revenue, its VOTING ON REWARDS.
Unfortunately, this discussion is going absolutely nowhere if you don't want to put forth why and how curation is censorship or why and how voting on rewards is revenue. You also didn't answer if you understood the reason and rationale behind flagging or punishment, it seems you hardly address the entirety of my comments OR bother to explain why work curated as hidden by default, with a conspicuous button that at once ANYONE can click to reveal the content curated as hidden, is tantamount to censorship or explain how and why it's the worst kind/style of censorship. The best part is that you have to continue to resort to painting an otherwise benign or neutral act as sensational as possible, calling freedom of expression as the worst kind of censorship, freedom to curate an active post or comment as "losing of revenue" and otherwise referring to the right for everyone to curate, review/rate as the most totalitarian form of censorship, which hardly seem totalitarian or censorship but you're convinced it seem that somefuckingway
We
Are
Comparing
Censorship Styles.
We are discussing your confusion, confusion which you think will sustain if you keep repeating it it seems.
Posted using Partiko Android