You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Proposing Steem Equality 0.19.0 as the Next Fork
The community has been discussing this for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported. There's been disagreement about exactly what formula to use, but this is a big step forward. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported
for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported
for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported
for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported
for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported
for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported
for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported
for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported
for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported
for months now. I don't think there's any issue that been more widely supported
I haven't seen consensus for a switch to linear rewards. Some have supported it, some have supported less-exponential curves.
I have supported less exponential, but not completely linear. But are you referring to the 4x to 10x power vote here?
Yeah, I figure @donkeypong is talking about the reward curve when he says formula. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I think the agreement is on change of the status quo, not on how.
IF the experiment is lowered to 400mv, ~9600usd, I bet the newbs respond.
It can be raised as a function of market cap.