Just needed to pipe up here, since I am a part of the executive group deciding by consensus what is what.

We have been debating whether it is ok for us to resteem posts related to the projeect. I am in favour of this, and we gained a 4/5 consensus. @transisto was absent.

I also put in my vote, which also is 4/5 consensus (and we are now wondering if we need to include @transisto who is contributing much, but not as passionate about the overall project, as the other 4 in the group, that we may not upvote each other's posts, in the meantime until we make a consensus-bot that publishes articles on our behalf when we all agree.

I just want to let everyone know, and maybe I am not the only one in the consensus circle, who is saying this, even now, but we are, above all, aiming to develop a system of governance for Steem, that integrates the developers, witnesses, and the constitutents (steem HODLers) whose fortunes are impacted by such decisions.

It is my personal belief, and I speak only of myself, and I refer to the success of Dash, that perfecting governance of a distributed database that includes a financial ledger (this distinction really is unique and remarkable for Steem) is the key to ending tyranny.

The general name for people who want to end Tyranny is Anarchists. Archon, the root in anARCHist, means Tyrant, which means an individual who claims ownership over the HUMANS (and others) in a social group. We want to end tyranny, and to this end, we are strictly adopting a 100% consensus rule in our group, which also limits how big it can grow, but nothing that we do, in our collective capacity, is disagreed with by any member.

We are a seamless wall of gofuckyourselftyrant. ok?

Troll, Tyrant, Government. All the same in my book. I am not stating any of this in the capacity of the #steem-coop but I doubt that any point is greatly disagreed by our group.