RE: Discussion to change witness voting procedures
I'm sure you've woken up thinking about this after @pharesim made a post about it. I've been thinking about this quite a bit myself since yesterday too.
Honestly, its not like I cant say that it would not be tempting to participate of the vote exchanges to stay on the top 20. The incentive is very, very tempting, which is why @pharesim won me over with his decision to vote his values.
I've been thinking however that another thing Steemian citizens should do, is to partake on our equivalent of a grassroots movement, because specifically talking about the one who made it to the top 20, I don't think its the platform's consensus... its closer to a political move, for political gain.
I dunno, I'm ok with being wrong on this one, but I'm currently thinking if I could/should do something about it.
Been thinking awhile and posted a few things in the past but glad @pharesim posted last night. This particular one was inspired by a chat with him just before.
The problem with having 30 votes is that small voters are squeezed out of having significant say unless massive amounts of them team up and forma voting PAC. Possible, but unlikely.
It is good to talk openly about these things though as they affect us all.